1.14

Comment

Representation ID: 3962

Received: 12/11/2022

Respondent: Mr Mohammad Nouri

does not seem you did enough otherwise some of your plans such as the land on linthouse lane should stop .

Object

Representation ID: 4070

Received: 13/12/2022

Respondent: Mrs Helen O'Hara

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The 4000 home contribution towards homes in the GBBCHMA has been calculated using data which is now out of date and the figure should be removed/revised. If these homes are built in Staffordshire's proposed areas they will result in a destruction of the greenbelt contrary to government policy. Due to South Staffs unique geographical location there is an abundance of brownfield land in close proximity in neighbouring authorities which would preserve the greenbelt in line with government policy and the Levelling Up and Regeneration bill

Object

Representation ID: 5450

Received: 23/12/2022

Respondent: Mr Nicholas Greenwood

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

4000 extra dwellings is a near doubling of housing requirement to 2038. Numbers for DtC in flux following collapse of Black Country Plan. South Staffs should withdraw 4000 contribution and should not be meeting Wolverhampton's 35% uplift.