Question 1

Support

Representation ID: 2

Received: 01/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Mohammad Nouri

Obviously it is necessary and very important to have enough evidence for every single plan we make to make sure that plan will work in the best interest of the parties involve .

Object

Representation ID: 14

Received: 01/11/2021

Respondent: Ms M Collins

It does not adequately explain why south Staffordshire is taking housing quota from Greater Birmingham region when there are plenty of brownfield sites and even green belt sites there to be utilised first. Also how resources will be adapted in south Staffordshire to support the additional houses. There have been no surveys to whether the proposed SAD are where people want houses to built ie where the shortfall is required to be built

Object

Representation ID: 32

Received: 03/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs Julie Taylor

very biased reporting.

Object

Representation ID: 34

Received: 03/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Simon Whale

Destroying the local area is a disgrace.

Object

Representation ID: 50

Received: 05/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs L Millward

Would prefer more detail of the actual location and site name, currently I can't quite tell where exactly the work is planned. I know there is a proposed site near where I live but I cannot locate it on the current plan and would like to know where exactly it is.

Object

Representation ID: 65

Received: 08/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs Judith Longman

(Ref. 3.2) The current situation of Wombourne's relationship/services with the County Council re decisions made to reduce its vital services, eg closing magistrates court, police station and recently preventing full usage of the Community Centre post lockdown, (raising concerns that the venue/library will be sold). Current facilities are not sufficient for current Wombourne population. Infrastructure not adequate, transport to Staffordshire key services currently not available. Retail facilities are poor, closest town is Wolverhampton and is poor there. Cross boundary health services poor for Wombourne residents who do not receive same benefits as 'neighbours'. Wolverhampton has brownfield sites and needs development.

Object

Representation ID: 68

Received: 08/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Darren Broadbent

The land on site 582 is prone to flooding and has for many years

Object

Representation ID: 69

Received: 09/11/2021

Respondent: Mr James Aust

I fully disagree with the proposed plans to build more houses in Wombourne

Object

Representation ID: 83

Received: 09/11/2021

Respondent: Mr ken brookes

I object to and against the Preferred Option G- and its proposals for thousands of homes aligned alongside the Wednesfield Boundary adjacent to Essington .I enjoy seeing the land farmed agriculturally, as an amenity. I enjoy the farming that takes place on the land inside Essington Parish. I would be horrified to see its loss, as would the majority of our friends on Ashmore Park . I love to see the crop rotation as does our neighbours , and whilst it is on the ‘other side’ of our boundary, we see, as do others it is a great asset .

Object

Representation ID: 84

Received: 09/11/2021

Respondent: Mr ken brookes

Thousands of homes alongside Ashmore Park within South Staffs Boundaries will stretch Wednesfields education and health services, our District neighbourhood facilities, local district shopping and Public transport requirements . The roads are already congested in the area and adding to that is a folly.The building could go on for years with the noise the pollution and all the heavy equipment required working day after day .The lower part of the site floods and would cost millions to build storm drains along Linthouse Lane with all the disruption that would cause ,not to mention a new sewer would also be required

Object

Representation ID: 85

Received: 09/11/2021

Respondent: Mr ken brookes

The Essington Greenbelt is a valuable amenity for Wednesfield It allows people including me from our part of Wednesfield to enjoy the countryside, enjoy the farming, and what farming brings to our environment. It gives us great public walks .Great sun-rises, great sunsets over Kitchen lane, seeing the stars when the sun sets with very little light pollution when night time sweeps over our area. I have seen migrating flocks of birds year after year what happens to them if it is built on? and all the other wildlife.

Object

Representation ID: 87

Received: 09/11/2021

Respondent: Mr David Badger

The area cannot sustain the additional foot fall and traffic once so many new homes are built. We will loose a great open space where many different species of wildlife live. This goes against all the COP26 proposals of assisting the environment, we should be protecting our open spaces and utilise the many brown site areas instead or even renovate the many empty homes available in the area.

Object

Representation ID: 88

Received: 09/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Adam Price

I do not agree with building on green belt land in Wombourne. You are stripping away what makes this a beautiful village and killing habitats for the sake of housing which can be built on many brown sites.

Object

Representation ID: 92

Received: 09/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Darren Imms

To build more houses in Wombourne is absolutely not sustainable. Building the amount of houses planned would stretch resources to the absolute maximum. There is already issues with the sewage systems and flooding situations plus the amount of increased traffic would create huge issues within the village and surrounding areas. The extra influx of residents will create an untenable situation in relation to the Doctors and schools in the area. The Doctors are already unable to cope with the demands it already has so any extra will cause a catastrophic situation.

Object

Representation ID: 105

Received: 10/11/2021

Respondent: Miss Amanda Griss

Most people in Wombourne will not have read this information and most likely won't know about new builds. I feel you should go door to door to consult "everyone".

Object

Representation ID: 123

Received: 12/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs Julie Taylor

There are many houses vacant and available buy or rent. Duty to coperate has been fuflfilled with hundreds of homes being built over the past 30years. Building on green spaces/green belt is in direct conflict with the Environment Act 2020 which states town planners are legally bound to protect and enhance our environment. it requires you to create and protect habitiats... e.g the water vole population has recently recovered in wombourne ( we the largest population in the region) but further disruption to the waterways, especially in relation to overspill after heavy rain fall, will wipe out this protected species.

Support

Representation ID: 131

Received: 14/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs K TAYLOR

I love seeing the green fields and it will be a very sad day if they get eaten up for houses.

Support

Representation ID: 136

Received: 15/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Flavell

The evidence base seems appropriate.

Object

Representation ID: 146

Received: 15/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Carl Harper

The local plan does not take into account the following :

Local Wildlife Preservation for south staff(Wombourne, Kinver, etc).
Public Health.
No plans show what land will be returned to the public (recreational) etc.

Object

Representation ID: 148

Received: 15/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Carl Harper

No, Personal and Mental health have not been taken into account!

The wildife preservation have not been taken into account.

Object

Representation ID: 163

Received: 17/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Mark Carpenter

The documents that i have read only show the case for the proposal, where are the documentation submissions that have evidence against the proposal so that the benefits and the costs can be taken in to account when making the decision

Object

Representation ID: 168

Received: 17/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Brian Graystone

No account of local peoples views taken into account

Object

Representation ID: 180

Received: 17/11/2021

Respondent: D Coxsell

More up to date studies need to be carried out, especially after the flooding in Linthouse Lane.

Object

Representation ID: 192

Received: 18/11/2021

Respondent: Ms Jacquie Leach

There has been no consideration regarding the road infrastructure in Penkridge.
1. No studies of predicted air pollution with future increase in traffic on A449 and Boscomoor Road
2. No studies on traffic passing through the village Centre on Cannock Road where roads and pavements are very narrow.
3. No studies on red listed species in the area and species coming in from other countries to breed.
4. No studies on the historical significance of Penkridge.

Object

Representation ID: 200

Received: 20/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs Sarah Murphy

Regardless of any plans and considerations that have been made, we are 100% opposed to the development going ahead. This will completely ruin the local area and destroy the wildlife habitat and open space forever.

Object

Representation ID: 208

Received: 20/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Karl Fisher

The area of Wombourne does not have the infrastructure to support the proposed new housing sites. Already the area is at a tipping point in regard to traffic and amenities to support its current population. The proposed developments if to move forward would cause absolute chaos and would be catastrophic for the area.

There is no requirement for further housing developments in this locality. There are still vacant houses/apartments from recently completed builds which alone demonstrates that there is no pressing need or demand for more housing in the area.

Object

Representation ID: 210

Received: 22/11/2021

Respondent: A G Morris

Your proposals do not agree with any alignment of any Climate Change Policy. It will create more carbon output through increased infrastructure demands, increased traffic, more power and energy being consumed at a time when energy consumption should be being reduced.

Object

Representation ID: 231

Received: 22/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs Catherine Sutton

The increase in foot and motor traffic is impossible for a small centre to contain with any degree of good living. The infrastructure and resources are just not there, nor is there space for them to be.

Object

Representation ID: 242

Received: 23/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Alex Fenlon

How can you protect green belt yet want to build homes on land? There are plenty of existing brownfield sites in the Wolverhampton area that could be used, and therefore green belt be protected.

After discussion with the local bus company - I also don't see how the development will be sustainable.

Object

Representation ID: 251

Received: 23/11/2021

Respondent: Ms Claire Jones

This evidence base is inaccurate because you have not undertaken a meaningful assessment of the districts housing needs directly. In short, nobody has asked myself or my family what their housing needs are, either now or in the future. No residents have been directly asked. A meaningful consultation comprises a question as a legally required response, similar to that for voting requirements. I do not agree that the housing need figures are accurate. The needs of SSDC residents should have priority over those of neighbouring authorities and you cannot do this, because you do not know, because you haven't asked