Question 9
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 10
Received: 01/11/2021
Respondent: Mr Mohammad Nouri
Gypsy and travellers should be located in an area outside congested and busy neighbourhood for the safety of the neighbourhood and also the road congestions . I have no idea about any site but I believe it has to be outside town in a specially designed location which won't cause any issue to the neighbourhood according to the life style that gypsy and travellers may have .
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 24
Received: 03/11/2021
Respondent: N/a
i am supportive of the locations. i would add that i am unsure how the 1 plot GT18 will work in reality as it appears to be situated to the rear of trade/businesses and to the side of a proposed development site. would this not box the site in and make it less likely to be utilised by the travelling community?
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 41
Received: 03/11/2021
Respondent: Mr Simon Whale
Nonsense
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 56
Received: 05/11/2021
Respondent: Mrs K Edwards
lots of open space. smaller sites not so much upheaval on local transport/communities.
This is well in south staffs areas, you want the revenue build well within your boundaries, no need to incrouch elsewehere.
Good existing road networks
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 78
Received: 09/11/2021
Respondent: Mr James Aust
I fully disagree with the proposed plans to build more houses in Wombourne
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 101
Received: 09/11/2021
Respondent: Mr Darren Imms
I have no issues with site GT18
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 114
Received: 10/11/2021
Respondent: Miss Amanda Griss
GT18 Wombourne [redaction]. Showmen for work purposes should be put in Himley hotel. [redaction]. No I don't agree.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 144
Received: 15/11/2021
Respondent: Mrs Judith Longman
GT18 - lack of infrastructure, congestion adjacent roads. Green belt land. Currently the health services in the area are at capacity and infrastructure is poor. School are also currently at capacity which would affect travellers hugely.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 145
Received: 15/11/2021
Respondent: Mrs Judith Longman
GT18 - I do not know of an alternative, but I reusing a brownfield site in an area with better infrastructure, facilities less congestion services and improved road links would be appropriate. Health services and school provision is not available in Wombourne.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 159
Received: 16/11/2021
Respondent: Mrs Ann Jauncey
REF GT35, strongly object due to the impact on our amenity to living in close proximity to the site. Parking of commercial vehicles already belonging to the travellers in the lane is diabolical visually making it unable to navigate around long lanes of parked vans. The fires they have at night resulting from collections from their businesses causing serious smells and plumes of smoke. The constant dog barking day and night drives us insane. Sanitation issues we currently have in the village is a major issue, along with flooding, and not withstanding they are making the lane undesirable.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 161
Received: 16/11/2021
Respondent: Mr Arran Shuker
Site ref GT18
[redaction].
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 176
Received: 17/11/2021
Respondent: Mr Brian Graystone
[redaction]. Do not encourage them to come here.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 219
Received: 22/11/2021
Respondent: A G Morris
Can Essington support the requirements of this community when we have little or no facilities ourselves?
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 232
Received: 22/11/2021
Respondent: Heine Planning
Policy is overdue
Support for all proposed sites-many of which have a long planning history
The need must be expressed as a minimum need
All allocations should be inset from the Green Belt
Potential for more pitches at GT01
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 249
Received: 23/11/2021
Respondent: Mr Alex Fenlon
Agree
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 262
Received: 23/11/2021
Respondent: Ms Claire Jones
I
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 268
Received: 24/11/2021
Respondent: Mr L Wildman
GT17
opposition to the landywood stables allocation on the grounds that there are already sizable and numerous traveller sites within the locality.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 275
Received: 24/11/2021
Respondent: Mr Angus Hughes
Access to the proposed site would be dangerous. Visibility is poor and there is regular flooding in that area which may adversely impact the proposed area, or worsen it.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 297
Received: 25/11/2021
Respondent: Brewood Civic Society
System problem, no opertunity to answer Q9 B
Q9 A
Yes
No comment
Q9 B
No
No comment
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 318
Received: 27/11/2021
Respondent: Ms Jacquie Leach
GT01 has been in place since 2009 and I feel has been successful.
Penkridge also has a travelling community on the canal infrastructure which hasn't been mentioned.
Canal boat residents use facilities such as the Library when passing through. More facilities need to be provided to cater for their needs.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 365
Received: 03/12/2021
Respondent: Nicola Dixon
No response
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 375
Received: 05/12/2021
Respondent: Inland Waterways Association (IWA)
IWA does not support allocation GT08 Brinsford Bridge. The existing site has had a damaging impact on the environment and setting of the adjacent Staffordshire & Worcestershire Canal and its Conservation Area. Extension of the site should not be permitted, unless it includes the provision of major landscape screening from the canal and a long term requirement to maintain its effectiveness.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 398
Received: 07/12/2021
Respondent: Mr T Cowern
Agent: Mr Hugh Lufton
Yes, part of land off Queens Road, Calf Heath.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 412
Received: 08/12/2021
Respondent: Lichfield & Hatherton Canals Restoration Trust
No further comments to offer.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 500
Received: 10/12/2021
Respondent: Mr Darren Parsons
We do not support any further gypsy or traveler plots especially streets lane as these people have and are already causing problems on this bungalow and land by allowing several dogs to bark 24/7 multiple vehicles parked obstructing the road rubbish all over the land and bonfires been lit burning all sorts causing thick black smoke to drift down the street. We object on the above grounds and the grounds of [redacted] PLEASE DO NOT ALLOW ANY FURTHER CAMPS
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 504
Received: 10/12/2021
Respondent: Mr Darren Parsons
I do not support any extra gypsy or traveller sites or pitches [redacted].
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 520
Received: 11/12/2021
Respondent: DOCTOR Prabhjoyt Kler
Too many sites, needs to be reduced due to the impact across various sites and local communities.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 527
Received: 11/12/2021
Respondent: Ms Liz Sithole
This is right by my doorstep and had no idea until a couple of weeks ago. That Lane is already quite busy with traffic. Will roads be widened and traffic calming? Surrounding area has a large population of elderly and young children and more traffic and people would make it very busy. Also with more people issues of safety and anti-social behaviour may arise which we already see around the Quinton area and some of the fields. How are you going to keep us, the elderly and our children safe?
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 538
Received: 11/12/2021
Respondent: Mr R Gidlow
..
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 546
Received: 11/12/2021
Respondent: Mr David Harrison
There should be no consideration at all of using green belt land for traveller sites. The impact of inevitable antisocial behaviour must also be considered.