Question 12

Support

Representation ID: 13

Received: 01/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Mohammad Nouri

of course these are all strategy and without an strategy you can't fulfil any policy but it does not mean they are all good strategies , good strategy is the one based on the facts and realities otherwise it will ruin the plan we have .

Object

Representation ID: 44

Received: 03/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Simon Whale

Your not fit for purpose
Stay away from cross green

Object

Representation ID: 81

Received: 09/11/2021

Respondent: Mr James Aust

I fully disagree with the proposed plans to build more houses in Wombourne

Object

Representation ID: 104

Received: 09/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Darren Imms

Again as previously outlined and stated

Object

Representation ID: 117

Received: 10/11/2021

Respondent: Miss Amanda Griss

Sounds like you've made up your mind already that you'll build on the green belt already. This bit:

Confirm that renewable energy development in the Green Belt may be justified, where very special circumstances can be demonstrated for any elements which would be inappropriate Green Belt development

This does not sound strategic. Sounds like you want the public to re write your policies for you. Do another consultation with questions after each section instead of after 35.....then I'll try harder! How do you expect me to remember???

Object

Representation ID: 179

Received: 17/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Brian Graystone

No consultation with real local people. Repair the roads instead of upsetting everyone. Building on green field sites is not acceptable

Object

Representation ID: 221

Received: 22/11/2021

Respondent: A G Morris

Does this climate change agenda align with the housing proposals in Linthouse Lane and elsewhere? Er, no.

Is your plan to accommodate climate change good enough? No.

Where is you plan to offer insulation grants, solar panels, use hydro-electric power and discreetly place small wind turbines at schools?
Nowhere.

This is a very poor and unimaginative plan.

Support

Representation ID: 278

Received: 24/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Angus Hughes

I agree that they are strategic policies, but I also would like assurance that these policies are adhered to their full criteria. I also believe all of the criteria set out in the proposals in the various elements of Chapter 6 Development management Policies should form part of future strategy. This will make it much clearer and defined about what can and can't be supported within any proposed future developments.

Support

Representation ID: 300

Received: 25/11/2021

Respondent: Brewood Civic Society

System problem. no opertunity to answer Q12 b)
Q12 a)
Yes
No comment

Object

Representation ID: 321

Received: 27/11/2021

Respondent: Ms Jacquie Leach

Penkridge should have its own Development plan.
All the strategic policies should be re examined.
The NPPFStates:-‘That there is a presumption in favour of sustainable development.’ This has not been satisfied as nothing at the moment in the Plan is "sustainable". More work needs to be done.
The long term growth of Penkridge needs re-examination and more consultation.
A ‘piecemeal approach ’ has been used and any statistics that haven't been reached seem to have been "dropped" on Penkridge without much thought. Houses by a Bio digester for example.

Support

Representation ID: 409

Received: 08/12/2021

Respondent: Lichfield & Hatherton Canals Restoration Trust

Policy NB10 should be substantially expanded to ensure continuing protection for the Hatherton Canal route, and consideration should be given to raising its status to a strategic policy as the canal restoration contributes to many of the objectives of other policies within the present Local Plan document.

Object

Representation ID: 453

Received: 10/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Chris Manton

See previous answers

Support

Representation ID: 478

Received: 10/12/2021

Respondent: Bellway Homes Limited (Hyde Lane site)

Agent: Turley

Policies DS1 – DS4 and SA1 – SA7 represent policies which are limited to those necessary to address the strategic priorities of the area, providing a starting point for any non-strategic policies that are needed as defined by NPPF paragraph 21.

Support

Representation ID: 487

Received: 10/12/2021

Respondent: Bellway Homes Limited (Dunsley Drive site)

Agent: Turley

Policies DS1 – DS4 and SA1 – SA7 represent policies which are limited to those necessary to address the strategic priorities of the area, providing a starting point for any non-strategic policies that are needed as defined by NPPF paragraph 21.

Support

Representation ID: 507

Received: 10/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Darren Parsons

I agree

Object

Representation ID: 523

Received: 11/12/2021

Respondent: DOCTOR Prabhjoyt Kler

Policies are outdated and the aspirations in some of the documents do not meet current standards. Policies should include plans for any delays, detailed information of how sewage structure will improve, how flood risk will improve etc. I fail to see this in any documentation.

Object

Representation ID: 541

Received: 11/12/2021

Respondent: Mr R Gidlow

this policy is a sell out of the residents of South Staffs by its elected representatives

Support

Representation ID: 572

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: R Simner

no further comment

Support

Representation ID: 614

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Keon Homes

Agent: Evolve Planning & Design

a) Keon Homes agrees that the policies outlined above represent strategic policies.
b) Final drafted policy wording would be required to determine whether a policy is strategic.

Support

Representation ID: 629

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Lovell Homes

Agent: Evolve Planning & Design

a) Lovell Homes agrees that the policies outlined above represent strategic policies.
b) Final drafted policy wording would be required to determine whether a policy is strategic.

Object

Representation ID: 652

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Kinver Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group

Policies SA1 to SA7 are detailed policies allocating plots of land for development. The level of detail is inappropriate for a strategic policy. Therefore we do not agree that policies SA1 to SA7 are strategic in nature.

Support

Representation ID: 667

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Mr P Wilkinson

Green infrastructure policy required. Highgate common SSSI and Baggeridge Country Park are both being harmed by increased footfall, there is a requirement for new open spaces to be be created alongside housing and employment development to mitigate and compensate.

Support

Representation ID: 686

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: David Wilson Homes

Agent: Turley

Policies DS1 – DS4 and SA1 – SA7 represent policies which are limited to those necessary to address the strategic priorities of the area providing a starting point for any non-strategic policies that are needed as defined by NPPF paragraph 21.

Support

Representation ID: 699

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Mr John Baggott

Yes. The listed policies (DS1-DS4 and SA1-SA7) do appear to meet the requirements of paragraph 21 of the NPPF and as such it is agreed that these amount to strategic policies, albeit that it is suggested that Policy DS3 should be amended, as indicated in the responses to question 5 above.

Support

Representation ID: 714

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Penk Valley Academy Trust

No further comment

Support

Representation ID: 725

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Home Builders Federation

Please refer to detailed comments.

Support

Representation ID: 755

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs R Groom

They are all strategic policies

Support

Representation ID: 773

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs Katie Warrington

However we need to ensure that Penkridge is given the right facilities to support the ever expanding population including those I have already mentioned in my previous answers and an additional doctors surgery or super surgery. This is imperative and very important. We are already straggling with the number of patients and without more doctors and an additional surgery, we can't cope with anymore

Object

Representation ID: 790

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: L&Q Estates

Agent: Barton Willmore

Please refer to our Representations to the Preferred Options Consultation, on behalf of L&Q Estates, in relation to land at Yieldfields, Bloxwich. The Representations include the below reports:

• Site Boundary Plan (Drawing RG-M-30)
• Extract from Draft Policy WSA4 of the Draft Black Country Plan 2039
• Illustrative Concept Masterplan (Drawing BM-M-14C)
• Illustrative Concept Masterplan with Phasing (Drawing BM-M-15A)
• Review of Sustainability Appraisal (December 2021)
• Green Belt Advice Note (November 2019)
• Landscape, Visual and Green Belt Appraisal (December 2019)
• Transport Technical Note (October 2021)
• Preliminary Ecological Review: Constraints and Opportunities (July 2019)

Support

Representation ID: 831

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Land Fund Limited

Agent: Turley

Policies DS1 – DS4 and SA1 – SA7 represent policies which are limited to those necessary to address the strategic priorities of the area providing a starting point for any non-strategic policies that are needed as defined by NPPF paragraph 21.

We trust that these representations are given due consideration in the progression of the Plan. Should you have any queries, or wish to discuss further, please do not hesitate to contact [contact details redacted].