Preferred Options November 2021
Search representations
Results for Historic England search
New searchObject
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 1
Representation ID: 1202
Received: 15/02/2022
Respondent: Historic England
Evidence base needs strengthening. Link needs to be made between evidence base recommendation and policy text.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 3
Representation ID: 1209
Received: 15/02/2022
Respondent: Historic England
Table 2: welcome the inclusion of heritage as a strength within the 'built assets'. Note natural landscapes are historic landscapes.
Table 5: Welcome the reference to heritage within this section.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 3
Representation ID: 1210
Received: 15/02/2022
Respondent: Historic England
Table 2: Include opportunities for the historic environment within this section such as reducing heritage at risk, increasing heritage tourism and access to heritage.
Pg23: Suggest inclusion of a reference within the vision for the historic environment.
Table 6 Objective 13: Heritage also relates to historic landscapes. Current objective focuses only on the 'built' element, suggest should include a broader definition.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 4
Representation ID: 1211
Received: 15/02/2022
Respondent: Historic England
Policy DS2 - Recommend amending 'historic assets' to 'heritage assets' to reflect NPPF.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 5
Representation ID: 1212
Received: 15/02/2022
Respondent: Historic England
Para 4.12 - Ensure historic environment, heritage assets and setting are protected and enhanced.
Para 4.21 - No reference to heritage in this section. Difficult therefore to assess how historic environment has been considered in relation to cumulative impact of proposed housing development.
Para 4.58 - We await findings of updated EDNA.
Policy DS3 - Strengthen the wording of this clause relating to heritage.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 6
Representation ID: 1213
Received: 15/02/2022
Respondent: Historic England
Policy DS4 - Reference should be made to protection and enhancement of the historic environment. Assessment will be required to consider impacts and opportunities for the historic environment.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 7
Representation ID: 1227
Received: 15/02/2022
Respondent: Historic England
SA1 - Include HESA recommendations. Give full consideration to historic environment at masterplanning/SPD stage.
SA2 & SA3 - Can't find reference to this site in the HESA. Please submit so we can comment.
SA4 - recommend that additional detail is provided on how the significance of the heritage assets will be affected & appropriate mitigation strategies.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 8
Representation ID: 1230
Received: 15/02/2022
Respondent: Historic England
Site 419 - HESA 2019 mitigation measures should be referenced within policy.
Site 224 - Additional detail on potential impact on conservation area and possible mitigation measures.
Site 141 - HESA 2019 references HESA 2017 without detail on potential issues.
Site 136 - Appropriate mitigation measures should be incorporated into policy.
Site 139 - HESA 2019 references HESA 2017 without detail on potential issues.
Site 638 - HESA 2020 references 350m zone not 500m zone.
Site 704 - Additional information required on mitigation strategy which should be included in policy.
Site 536a - Impact on Grade II farmhouse. Mitigation measures should be included in policy.
Site 005 - Impact on Grade II farmhouse. Mitigation measures should be included in policy.
Site 617 - Impact on Conservation Area. Possibility of roman remains.
Site 079 - Impact on Brewood Conservation Area, Canal Conservation Area and listed buildings. Mitigation measures?
Site 591 - Impact on Grade II farmhouse. Mitigation measures should be included in policy.
Site 016 - Impact on Grade II farmhouse. Mitigation measures should be included in policy.
Site 274 - Impact on Kinver Camp hillfort. Mitigation measures?
Site 272 - Impact on Kinver Conservation Area. Mitigation measures?
Site 576 - Impact on Grade II inn. Mitigation measures should be included in policy.
Site 239 - HESA 2019 protection measures to be included in policy text.
Site 416 - Consideration of archaeological remains to be included in policy text.
Site 285 - Mitigation measures should be included in policy text.
Site 463/284 - Impact on Conservation Area & heritage assets. Welcome additional information and details of mitigation strategy.
Site 286 - Impact on Himley Hall Registered Park and Garden.
Site 082 - Impact on Grade II farmhouse. Mitigation measures?
Site 168 - Impact on Grade II* Moseley Old Hall.
Site 397 - Impact on Grade II* Moseley Old Hall.
Site 255 - HESA 2019 identifies consideration of archaeological remains.
Site 251 - Impact on Conservation Area and local heritage assets.
Site 313 - Impact on Grade II farmhouse. Mitigation?
Site 379 - HESA 2019 recommends inclusion of mitigation measures.
Site 426a - Additional information required to assess impact on listed heritage assets. Mitigation?
Site 610 - Additional information required to assess impact on listed assets. Mitigation?
Site 036c - Include mitigation measures in policy.
Site 582 - Protection of Castlecroft Garden Conservation Area?
Appendix C site proformas include no reference to heritage and required mitigation measures.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 9
Representation ID: 1245
Received: 15/02/2022
Respondent: Historic England
GT01,05,06,08,18,23,32,33 - all sites scored green in HESA 2019 yet mitigation measures were identified.
GT07,14,17,34,35 - additional info to understand impacts & mitigation measures.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 10
Representation ID: 1246
Received: 15/02/2022
Respondent: Historic England
Table 9 employment sites don't have site reference number - have these been assessed?
Site E33 - Additional information required to enable assessment.