Preferred Options November 2021

Search representations

Results for Wolverhampton City Council search

New search New search

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 1

Representation ID: 994

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Wolverhampton City Council

Representation Summary:

Welcome to commitment of the Plan to update the 2018 EDNA. This should have regard to the West Midlands Interchange Apportionment Study and West Midlands Strategic Employment Sites Study, both published in 2021.

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 2

Representation ID: 995

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Wolverhampton City Council

Representation Summary:

Transport - Developments should minimise trip generation and have good access to the rail network. Development should link effectively to the strategic transport network, in particular high-capacity corridors such as the A449 and the proposed M6 link road, avoiding excessive pressure on sensitive transport links such as the A454, the urban A460 and non-strategic routes. Education - unclear how secondary needs will be addressed arising from the Linthouse/Cross Green sites - support the principle of self containment for school places agreed through SoCG. Push back over time from the Langley Road development, for both primary and secondary places, is expected to be capable of being catered for in existing provision. Health - land should be set aside at Linthouse Lane and/or Cross Green sufficient to accommodate GP consulting rooms. SSDC should develop a developer contribution system which will secure sufficient funds to deliver GP consulting rooms. LP should make clear that the Langley Road development will be required to make sufficient contributions to deliver an extra GP consulting room in south west Wolverhampton. Green Infrastructure - developments on the edge of Wolverhampton should be integrated with existing and potential GI networks

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 3

Representation ID: 996

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Wolverhampton City Council

Representation Summary:

We request that the opportunity for the Plan to make a contribution towards wider unmet employment land needs is reflected in the Economic Vibrancy section of the Strategic Objectives of the Plan.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 6

Representation ID: 997

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Wolverhampton City Council

Representation Summary:

We support the longer term growth aspirations for a new settlement with strong sustainable transport links to the Black Country, which could help meet longer term Black Country housing shortfalls.Request that the affordable housing secured on sites proposed in the Plan within the Wolverhampton locality are allocated through nomination rights for Wolverhampton residents with requirement set out in the Publication Plan

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 7

Representation ID: 998

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Wolverhampton City Council

Representation Summary:

Agree 4 strategic sites should be subject to a detailed masterplan and design code, as should the Langley Road site.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 5

Representation ID: 999

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Wolverhampton City Council

Representation Summary:

Support for the preferred housing growth option of local housing need plus 4,000 homes to meet Greater Birmingham and Black Country Housing Market Area (HMA) need up to 2038 but request full 4,000 homes are attributed to the Black Country.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 2

Representation ID: 1000

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Wolverhampton City Council

Representation Summary:

Support for the continued promotion of the existing Brinsford Strategic Park and Ride site allocation in the Preferred Options

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.