Preferred Options November 2021

Search representations

Results for Richborough Estates search

New search New search

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 6

Representation ID: 1712

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Richborough Estates

Agent: Pegasus Group

Representation Summary:

Support policy DS4 and recognise the importance and suitability of this growth corridor as recognised in the Strategic Growth Study. Land North of the A5 falls within this area and is next to a proposal by Rodbaston College, offering an opportunity for a comprehensively planned site.

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 8

Representation ID: 1713

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Richborough Estates

Agent: Pegasus Group

Representation Summary:

Support the allocation of Site 224 (44 Station Road, Codsall), Site 610 (Land off Marston Road/Fenton House Lane) and Site 582 (Land North of Langley Road).

Land North of New Road, Featherstone should also be allocated as it is suitable and deliverable, subject to release from the Green Belt and a robust and defensible new Green Belt boundary can be provided.

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 11

Representation ID: 1714

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Richborough Estates

Agent: Pegasus Group

Representation Summary:

HC1 – Is not sufficiently clear or flexible with expectations and should be subject to viability assessment. Major development should be defined using DMPO, not NPPF.
HC2 –Blanket approach is unlikely to be effective.
HC3 – Should justify why social rent (rather than affordable rent) is the preferred tenure. Registered providers do require a degree of clustering for affordable housing. Funding mechanisms for affordable housing delivery are not a planning matter.
HC4 –Unclear justification for use of M4(2) and for the proportion sought, which does not reflect SHMA.
HC7 – Smaller dedicated self/custom build sites should be identified, rather than a blanket requirement and should include flexibility if no demand.
HC9 – Tree-lined streets should only be required with highways authority agreement. Design codes should be limited to strategic sites.
HC11 – M4(2) dwellings should have smaller gardens. NDSS is only supported by the SHMA on accessible/adaptable homes, not all properties.
HC12 – Standards (including EV chargers) are supported.
HC14/15 – SSDC should engage with CCG and SCC education to ensure all likely costs are known and assessed through viability.
HC17 – On-site equipped play is not supported where existing provision exists nearby. Requirements for centrally located greenspace and exclusion of small incidental green infrastructure is not supported.
HC18 – Should define standards expected from development.
EC1 – Impact of growth at strategic employment sites and ability of Featherstone housing growth to support delivery should be acknowledged
EC3 – Blanket requirement is not supported and fails to recognise the benefits of modular methods of construction.
EC9 – Engagement with providers should be taking place now.
EC10 – A detailed list of infrastructure requirements should be included in plan.
NB3 – Studies should influence policy approach
NB6 – Policy should confirm threshold for sites requiring energy statement.

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 1

Representation ID: 1719

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Richborough Estates

Agent: Pegasus Group

Representation Summary:

The SHELAA 2021, GBHMA Strategic Growth Study and Self and Custom Build Register should be identified as part of the evidence base. The GBHMA Strategic Growth Study is a key aspect of the evidence base informing the 4,000 home contribution to housing shortfalls and has been subject to scrutiny as part of the supporting evidence at the North Warwickshire Local Plan examination.

Green Belt parcel S53H extends significantly beyond the boundary of Land off Station Road, which should have a lower harm rating (low-moderate) when assessed against the five Green Belt purposes. The existing vegetation around the site will help to minimise the visual envelope of the site and its relationship with Codsall detracts from its landscape sensitivity.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 2

Representation ID: 1720

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Richborough Estates

Agent: Pegasus Group

Representation Summary:

Support the infrastructure-led strategy’s focus of development on larger settlements with smaller sites in smaller settlements to deliver infrastructure benefits. Land off Station Road could provide a 30 space car park, improve sports and leisure facilities, develop new primary education facilities, enhance the Green Infrastructure Network and provide health contributions.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 3

Representation ID: 1721

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Richborough Estates

Agent: Pegasus Group

Representation Summary:

The vision is succinct but not locally relevant and has no spatially specific elements. It seeks to ‘protect and enhance’ the District rather than considering how growth could be accommodated. The strategic objectives are supported, particularly objective 2. Draft policies will assist in delivering these objectives.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 4

Representation ID: 1722

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Richborough Estates

Agent: Pegasus Group

Representation Summary:

Policy DS1 is supported but should include recognition of exceptional circumstances existing to justify Green Belt release for sustainable development. No comment on Policy DS2.

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 5

Representation ID: 1723

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Richborough Estates

Agent: Pegasus Group

Representation Summary:

Table 8 should be included in the policy. Broadly support the policy approach in Policy DS3 but concerned that the housing target may be insufficient. The overall unmet need across the GBBCHMA is well in excess of 66,000 homes and SSDC should co-operate with other authorities within the GBBCHMA to ensure that the level of contributions made collectively is sufficient to collectively meet the shortfall. The SHMA currently fails to consider whether the minimum need figure from the standard method would support enough workforce growth to support planned job growth. Richborough Estates does not support limiting new allocations at Perton to only the safeguarded land. Featherstone could support further growth as it is located less than a mile away from a proposed strategic site (646a&b) and could support nearby employment opportunities.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 6

Representation ID: 1724

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Richborough Estates

Agent: Pegasus Group

Representation Summary:

Support policy DS4 and recognise the importance and suitability of this growth corridor as recognised in the Strategic Growth Study. Land North of the A5 could be brought forward alongside land being promoted at South Staffordshire college.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 8

Representation ID: 1725

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Richborough Estates

Agent: Pegasus Group

Representation Summary:

Support the allocation of Site 224 (44 Station Road, Codsall), Site 610 (Land off Marston Road/Fenton House Lane) and Site 582 (Land North of Langley Road).

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.