Preferred Options November 2021

Search representations

Results for Seabridge Development Limited search

New search New search

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 8

Representation ID: 1129

Received: 10/12/2021

Respondent: Seabridge Development Limited

Agent: Advance Land & Planning Limited

Representation Summary:

Support the proposed allocation of Site 139 and should be retained and carried forward in the emerging Local Plan due to the scrutiny undertaken upon the site during SAD process.
Confident that the increase in minimum capacity from 35 units to 46 units can be accommodated alongside required Public Open Space.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 11

Representation ID: 1130

Received: 10/12/2021

Respondent: Seabridge Development Limited

Agent: Advance Land & Planning Limited

Representation Summary:

Generally support Policy HC17.

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 11

Representation ID: 1131

Received: 10/12/2021

Respondent: Seabridge Development Limited

Agent: Advance Land & Planning Limited

Representation Summary:

Concerned with inflexibility pertaining to requirements and site context.
Policy HC17 is particularly prescriptive and doesn't consider on-site constraints. The word 'centrally' [located] should be replaced with 'appropriately' [located].
Location of open space should respect the principles of good urban design, accessibility and public surveillance etc.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.