Preferred Options November 2021
Search representations
Results for Seabridge Development Limited search
New searchSupport
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 8
Representation ID: 1129
Received: 10/12/2021
Respondent: Seabridge Development Limited
Agent: Advance Land & Planning Limited
Support the proposed allocation of Site 139 and should be retained and carried forward in the emerging Local Plan due to the scrutiny undertaken upon the site during SAD process.
Confident that the increase in minimum capacity from 35 units to 46 units can be accommodated alongside required Public Open Space.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 11
Representation ID: 1130
Received: 10/12/2021
Respondent: Seabridge Development Limited
Agent: Advance Land & Planning Limited
Generally support Policy HC17.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 11
Representation ID: 1131
Received: 10/12/2021
Respondent: Seabridge Development Limited
Agent: Advance Land & Planning Limited
Concerned with inflexibility pertaining to requirements and site context.
Policy HC17 is particularly prescriptive and doesn't consider on-site constraints. The word 'centrally' [located] should be replaced with 'appropriately' [located].
Location of open space should respect the principles of good urban design, accessibility and public surveillance etc.