Preferred Options November 2021

Search representations

Results for Bromsgrove District Council search

New search New search

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 1

Representation ID: 903

Received: 28/01/2022

Respondent: Bromsgrove District Council

Representation Summary:

No comment to make on location of development other than to say the locations chosen and site selection seems robust. The level of housing appears consistent with the standard method and the 4,000 dwelling contribution to the GBBCHMA is welcomed. Bromsgrove does not object to this, but does not specifically endorse the method by which it has been derived and views the GBHMA Strategic Growth Study 2018 as one of a number of pieces of evidence.

Bromsgrove note the surplus in employment land proposed and will work with South Staffordshire through updates to the FEMA to identify the most appropriate approach to defining the FEMA for both Districts.

The approach taken to the Duty to Co-operate (DtC) has been explained in full in the supporting DtC statement and is an accurate representation of discussions.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.