Preferred Options November 2021
Search representations
Results for N/a search
New searchSupport
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 4
Representation ID: 22
Received: 03/11/2021
Respondent: N/a
the new housing targets for the authority and unmet need from neighbouring authorities is unlikely to be met without utilising appropriate green belt land for development. there is not enough brownfield land to meet targets
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 5
Representation ID: 23
Received: 03/11/2021
Respondent: N/a
i support the proposed developments in and around wombourne. these developments appear to be located on land that isnt being reasonably used for anything and will not have an adverse impact on the village itself. there does need to be an emphasis on the diversification of property, properties of all types to ensure flow of people through the property ladder. a mix of properties suitable for first time buyers, affordable homes, 3/4 and 5 bed properties for families increasing in size, suitable properties for older people to downsize into that arent just care homes or supported living/retirement communities.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 9
Representation ID: 24
Received: 03/11/2021
Respondent: N/a
i am supportive of the locations. i would add that i am unsure how the 1 plot GT18 will work in reality as it appears to be situated to the rear of trade/businesses and to the side of a proposed development site. would this not box the site in and make it less likely to be utilised by the travelling community?
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 8
Representation ID: 25
Received: 03/11/2021
Respondent: N/a
the sites in around the wombourne area seem appropriate and proportionate, utilising land that isnt being used for much currently.