Preferred Options November 2021
Search representations
Results for Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd search
New searchSupport
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 11
Representation ID: 1393
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd
Agent: Pegasus Group
HC7 - approach generally supported, but policy should include mechanism for plots to come forward as market housing where lack of demand. HC9 - supports requirement for a requirements for high quality design. HC12 - continuation of existing parking standards supported. HC14- objective of ensuring impact of development does not have impact on health infrastructure is supported but engagement with CCG required. HC15 -approach to education supported but engagement with education authority required. EC9 - policy approach to infrastructure generally supported but engagement with the relevant providers is needed. EC10 - approach supported but detailed list of infrastructure requirements needed in Reg 19 plan. NB6 -policy supported but would need to confirm the threshold to which developments would be expected to submit an energy statement.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 1
Representation ID: 1693
Received: 14/03/2022
Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd
Agent: Pegasus Group
Concern that the Greater Birmingham HMA Strategic Growth Study,Self Build Register and 'SHELAA are not included. Regarding the SA, the finding that the site would have a Major Negative impact upon landscape
and townscape accordingly appears to be based upon an incorrect conclusion that the site would result in a 'high' level of harm to the Green Belt.Overall, it is considered that this reconsidered assessment would result a
reduced SA impact score of Minor Negative ('-') for the site in respect of Landscape and Townscape. Also dispute the Major Negative ('--') post-mitigation score
attributed to Site 486a in respect of education.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 2
Representation ID: 1694
Received: 14/03/2022
Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd
Agent: Pegasus Group
Supports proposed infrastructure-led strategy which seeks to focus development towards larger and better-connected settlements and, where appropriate, deliver new infrastructure benefits. The correct infrastructure to be delivered alongside proposed site allocations been been identified in the IDP.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 1
Representation ID: 1695
Received: 14/03/2022
Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd
Agent: Pegasus Group
Generally, the documents listed in Appendix A are considered to represent comprehensive evidence base necessary to support a local plan. It is also noted that a number of the documents have been updated in 2021, which is also supported.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 3
Representation ID: 1696
Received: 14/03/2022
Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd
Agent: Pegasus Group
The vision is not locally relevant and contains not spatially specific elements. It seeks to protect and enhance and rather than thinking about how the growth proposed can enhance the District.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 3
Representation ID: 1697
Received: 14/03/2022
Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd
Agent: Pegasus Group
Strategic Objectives broadly supported, particularly SO2 regarding meeting unmet needs of the GBHMA. It is considered that the draft emerging policies will assist in delivering these objectives.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 4
Representation ID: 1698
Received: 14/03/2022
Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd
Agent: Pegasus Group
Policy DS1 is broadly in line with national policy. The recognition within the supporting text that exceptional circumstances exist for Green Belt release within the District to allow for sustainable development within the plan period is also supported. However, this recognition should also be included within Policy DS1, with cross reference made to the relevant sites where Green Belt release is proposed.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 5
Representation ID: 1699
Received: 14/03/2022
Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd
Agent: Pegasus Group
Taylor Wimpey broadly supports the policy approach of Policy DS3
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 5
Representation ID: 1700
Received: 14/03/2022
Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd
Agent: Pegasus Group
Concerned that dwellings proposed through consultation are insufficient. South Staffordshire's need based on the standard method which should be treated as a minimum. May require an economic uplift particularity in light of WMI, i54 and ROF Featherstone employment proposals. No clear evidence that the housing proposed would be enough to support projected job growth. Overall need in GBHMA likely to be well in excess of 66000 homes.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 6
Representation ID: 1701
Received: 14/03/2022
Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd
Agent: Pegasus Group
Taylor Wimpey has no comment to make in respect of Policy DS4, other than to agree that such an option would not contribute to housing growth during the proposed plan period to 2038.