Preferred Options November 2021

Support

Representation ID: 2085

Received: 12/04/2022

Respondent: St Mary Parish and The Archdiocese of Birmingham

Agent: First City Limited

In agreement to the topics covered in the list of documents in Appendix A used to inform the Local Plan.

Support

Representation ID: 2086

Received: 12/04/2022

Respondent: St Mary Parish and The Archdiocese of Birmingham

Agent: First City Limited

No objections to infrastructure requirements
that are set out in the document in connection to Brewood.

Support

Representation ID: 2087

Received: 12/04/2022

Respondent: St Mary Parish and The Archdiocese of Birmingham

Agent: First City Limited

No objection to the stratgic objections set out in Table 6 of the plan. However noted, not all developments will be able to meet all of the strategic objectives and that should not be found to be a criticism of the development if it remains that the proposed scheme is sustainable and otherwise policy compliant.

In regards to the proposed allocation site ref.079: Land south of Kiddemore Green Road, Brewood, we have no objections to the draft policies in chapters 4 and 5 of the
Local Plan.

Support

Representation ID: 2088

Received: 12/04/2022

Respondent: St Mary Parish and The Archdiocese of Birmingham

Agent: First City Limited

Policy DS1 – Green Belt is similar to both National and the current planning policy for Green Belt and we therefore support this policy. Welcome the proposal for a separate GB SPD to be prepared which will take into consideration the latest updates in the NPPF published in July 2021.

Support

Representation ID: 2089

Received: 12/04/2022

Respondent: St Mary Parish and The Archdiocese of Birmingham

Agent: First City Limited

Support the spatial strategy set out in policy DS3: The Spatial Strategy. Agree Brewood has the capacity to accommodate further development and welcome the inclusion of site 079 as a proposed allocation to accommodate housing in Brewood.

Support

Representation ID: 2090

Received: 12/04/2022

Respondent: St Mary Parish and The Archdiocese of Birmingham

Agent: First City Limited

Support the proposed allocation of site 079 in the emerging Local Plan. Consider the site has been robustly
assessed and is more than suitable as a proposed allocated site in the emerging Local Plan.

The site has been deemed suitable for removal from the Green Belt as indicated by its selection to accommodate residential development. Reviewed the comments about the site set out in Appendix C and can confirm
vehicular and pedestrian access can be achieved via Kiddemore Green Road including using existing medical surgery access. However, an independent access can also be achieved direct onto Kiddemore Green Road.

Consideration has been given to the surroundings of the site and all of the key infrastructure requirements included in Appendix C. Consider the site has the
ability to accommodate a minimum of 43 dwellings and accommodate a mix of house types including an element of affordable housing. Can confirm the site can also
accommodate on site specialist older persons housing in the form of a small retirement village type development. A development can be achieved on the site that would be
policy compliant.

Excellent connectivity can be achieved into the village centre with access to services and facilities the settlement has to offer.

Support

Representation ID: 2091

Received: 12/04/2022

Respondent: St Mary Parish and The Archdiocese of Birmingham

Agent: First City Limited

HC1- Propose a level of flexibility should be applied to the housing mix to ensure diversity and prevent all development from looking the same and lacking any distinctiveness.

HC3 - Emphasis on the increase of 2 and 3 bedroom properties on developments through the district in conjunction to the requirement for a contribution to meeting the needs of the District’s ageing population in policy HC4- Homes for Older People.

Support

Representation ID: 2092

Received: 12/04/2022

Respondent: St Mary Parish and The Archdiocese of Birmingham

Agent: First City Limited

Agree policies Ds1 and DS4 should be strategic policies.

Object

Representation ID: 3946

Received: 12/04/2022

Respondent: St Mary Parish and The Archdiocese of Birmingham

Agent: First City Limited

we do not consider policies SA1-SA4 should be included as strategic policies as they are fairly detailed policies which paragraph 21 states this should not include as that should be left to other non-strategic policies.