Publication Plan November 2022

Comment

Representation ID: 6068

Received: 23/12/2022

Respondent: Resident

There are opportunities to create a new pedestrian route accross the river Penk accessing the schools.

Support

Representation ID: 6069

Received: 23/12/2022

Respondent: Resident

Support the ommission of SCC landholdings west of Penkridge.
- The railway and M6 provide defined boundaries to Penkridge village.
- The scale of development would not facilitate distributor road across the railway and river. This road would also not reduce demand on the A449.
- The development will not deliver a bypass and thus in the short term exacerbate existing traffic issues.
- There are no distinct boundaries to the proposed site.
- The site is detached from the rail station and schools and will generate increased traffic volume.
- Downgrading the A449 fails to take into account its linkages to businesses and nearby settlements.

Comment

Representation ID: 6070

Received: 23/12/2022

Respondent: Resident

Concerns that a conflict of interest is occuring as SCC is acting as highways advisor to SSDC and promoting a site.