Publication Plan November 2022

Object

Representation ID: 5329

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd

Agent: Pegasus Group

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

North of Blackhalve Lane
Green Belt Study
Unrestricted sprawl and encroachment : Site is adjacent the built up area and has strong urbanising influences. Development of site would not extend further in countryside than the existing built extent of Wolverhampton. Site would be rounding off of the urban area. Considered site only has a moderate contribution to purposes 1 and 3. Overall assessment of Green Belt harm should be revised to moderate, which would result also in reduced SA impact score.

Object

Representation ID: 5330

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd

Agent: Pegasus Group

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Concerned about the overly prescriptive detail set out in matters to be included within Strategic Master Plans, including specific elements such as forest schools.

Support

Representation ID: 5331

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd

Agent: Pegasus Group

Support allocation of Land North of Linthouse Lane as a strategic development location.

Object

Representation ID: 5332

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd

Agent: Pegasus Group

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Concerned about absolute requirements in the policy such as delivery of historic environment mitigation measures which are identified by the Council. Policy refers to integrating former Prestwood and avoiding any direct impacts. Such a requirement is inconsistent with national policy relative to Heritage Assets in the NPPF.

Object

Representation ID: 5333

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd

Agent: Pegasus Group

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Land North of Linthouse Lane
Sustainability Appraisal
Dispute the finding that the site would result in a Major Negative impact upon landscape and townscape. Site is identified as low-moderate for landscape sensitivity but ‘high’ Green Belt harm. Dispute the Green Belt impact and the greater weight that is given to Green Belt impact on the overall assessment. Score should be revised minor negative (see comments on Green Belt study).
Education – Negative impact on education fails to recognise the proposal includes land for a two-form entry primary school. Mitigation is sufficient to make the overall result Negligible.
Housing – site will be greater than 99 dwellings and should score Major Positive against housing objective.

Object

Representation ID: 5334

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd

Agent: Pegasus Group

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Land north of Linthouse Lane
Green Belt Study
Unrestricted sprawl and encroachment : Site is adjacent the built up area and has strong urbanising influences. Development of site would not extend further in countryside than the existing built extent of Wolverhampton. Site would be rounding off of the urban area. Considered site only has a moderate contribution to purposes 1 and 3. Overall assessment of Green Belt harm should be revised to moderate, which would result also in reduced SA impact score.