Publication Plan November 2022

Object

Representation ID: 4128

Received: 20/12/2022

Respondent: Bloor Homes Ltd and St Philips

Agent: Define Planning and Design Ltd

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

Summary:
Policy MA1’s scope is appropriate, but it is currently ambiguous and ineffective at points. It should be clarified that the SMPs should be submitted alongside planning applications and be approved upon their determination. The policy should also clarify that SMPs should broadly align with the scope of Concept Plans, and that technical assessments should drive SMPs. It should make clear that POS delivery should be standards/evidence driven, and should combine clauses H, I and L. Clause J should remove reference to ‘provably popular’ Design Codes.

Object

Representation ID: 4129

Received: 20/12/2022

Respondent: Bloor Homes Ltd and St Philips

Agent: Define Planning and Design Ltd

Legally compliant? Yes

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Yes

The approach to directing growth to Land North of Penkridge, a suitable, available and deliverable site to the north of a sustainable settlement, is sound. The amendment to the site allocation boundary, and the resultant impact on site capacity, should be considered given that the emerging Masterplan robustly demonstrates a capacity of c. 1,000 dwellings. To ensure that the policy is sound, a number of tweaks are required to the policy requirements as set out in Policy SA4, which are set out in full above.