Publication Plan November 2022

Object

Representation ID: 4234

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: DBA Estates Ltd

Agent: Fosse Planning

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

Strategic objective 2 is laudable, but at the present time the unmet development needs of the GBBCHMA are unknown and no agreement has been reached with the constituent authorities. As such the Duty to Cooperate remains incomplete whilst the allowance of 4,000 houses with SSDC's area as a proportionate response to the unmet need, remains uncertain.

Until agreement can be reached between the constituent authorities on the apportionment of the unmet need, the SSDC Local Plan Review cannot achieve Strategic objective 2.

Object

Representation ID: 4236

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: DBA Estates Ltd

Agent: Fosse Planning

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

SHELAA site 255 that was allocated in the 2021 Preferred Options document, should not have been deleted as there are no environmental or technical constraints to prevent it being brought forward for housing.

Object

Representation ID: 5570

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: DBA Estates Ltd

Agent: Fosse Planning

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

The proposed allocation in Pattingham, although safeguarded land, has no physical/recognisable southern boundary to the GB. This prejudices the permanence of the GB, causing it harm.