Object

Representation ID: 2325

Received: 11/12/2021

Respondent: Dr R Painter

- IDP comments on what's currently available and not how this infrastructure will preform with increased housing.
- Scant infrastructure south of Codsall, this area already suffers form congestion, poor public transport, poor cycleways health services and police struggle to cope with demand as they are based in the north of South Staffs.
-IDP is an audit.
- Strategy not infrastructure driven as development is proposed in areas with deprived of infrastructure.
- Housing allocation not evidence based (especially in locality 5).
- Supports s106 as opposed to CIL, which can be used to meet larger infrastructure requirements.
- Funding for improvements to existing highways, schools, medical facilities has not been identified.
- Misleading notes on superfast broadband speeds for 96% of homes and businesses.