Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 2910

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Mr C Stonehouse

Representation Summary:

a)No
The IDP is short term and generic.
Doesn't recognise the existing/potential needs of Penkridge.

b)Yes
A449 corridor has dominated Penkridge and the village centre needs to be re-claimed.
Major road system make over required (parking, footpath, cycleways, crossings).
Western Spine Road to take through traffic away from the village centre.
Open Space strategy should be re-examined to provide access for green infrastructure of the River Penk. The River Penk Park (approved 2001, never activated) should be included in future proposals.