Object

Representation ID: 5057

Received: 20/12/2022

Respondent: Goldfinch TPS

Agent: Goldfinch TPS

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? No

The Green Infrastructure evidence being used by the Council is far too vague, provides a meaningless planning policy framework, is insufficiently robust, and fails to respond effectively to deliver requirements of green infrastructure guidance expected by paragraphs 174 (indent d), 175 and 179 of the Revised NPPF (2021). The Council is taking forward an unsound policy (based on highly questionable, vague, totally meaningless and insufficiently robust evidence) which conflicts with the tests of Soundness as reinforced in paragraphs 31 and 35 (indents b and d) of the Revised NPPF (2021).
position is perfectly clear, the Council is using insufficiently robust Nature Recovery Network Mapping or Open Space Strategy to inform critically important housing-led spatial planning policy considerations across the district. The Council is taking forward an unsound policy which conflicts with the tests of Soundness as reinforced in paragraphs 31 and 35 (indents b and d) of the Revised NPPF (2021).
By encouraging destruction to sensitive wildlife corridors by promoting huge levels of new housing development immediately alongside the sensitive South Staffordshire Railway walk natural green space corridor within the Lower Penn area of the district (and other wildlife corridors in other parts of the district), the Council is failing to promote the most sustainable patterns of development, in direct conflict with the ‘Sustainability’ tests of ‘Soundness’ as reinforced in paragraph 35 (indent d) of the Revised NPPF (2021).