Policy SA5: Housing Allocations

Comment

Representation ID: 4418

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 224 - The retention of trees and hedgerows as well as additional planting will be required to mitigate the harm to he Conservation Area and protect existing historic character

Comment

Representation ID: 4419

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 419a&b - incorporate a mitigation measure about the archaeological investigation/mitigation measure as well as an explanation in the policy text as to why the retention of the tree and hedgerow boudnaries, in line with the HESA 2022 report

Comment

Representation ID: 4422

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 119a - Recommend adding a sentence that relates to the retention of the trees and hedgerow being necessary to conserve the existing historic character

Comment

Representation ID: 4423

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 523 - There is no reference in the plan in Appendix C under Site 523 to any of the mitigation measures identified in the HESA 2022 report, which we require to be included in the plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 4424

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 141 - request a clause that states archaeological investigation will be required pre-determination to understand what is present, prior to develpoment and inform the design of the site.

Comment

Representation ID: 4425

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 136 - Request that there is inclusion of the need for potential archaeological investigation on the site to understand the significance of finds and understand how development may come forward. Request the use of the term 'interpretation boards' in enhancement measures.

Comment

Representation ID: 4426

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 139 - The retention of trees on the site are required and form a mitigation measure rather than enhancement. Request deletion of 'wherever possible' in the table on page 187.

Comment

Representation ID: 4427

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 704 - Request a clause to be included with regards to archaeological investigation and mitigation based on HESA 2022 report

Comment

Representation ID: 4428

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 730 - include a clause regarding archaeological investigation and mitigation, based on HESA 2022.

Comment

Representation ID: 4429

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 536a - tree and hedgerow retention should be considered required mitigation not enhancement. Request addition to clarify that measures are to conserve the setting of heritage assets and historic character.

Comment

Representation ID: 4430

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 638 - Tree and hedgerow retention should be considered necessary mitigation not enhancement. Additional planting would be considered an enhancement measure and we would support this.

Comment

Representation ID: 4431

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 005 - Request inclusion of additional planting as a mitigation measure to protect the existing character of the Canal Conservation Area.

Comment

Representation ID: 4432

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 006 - Tree and hedgerow retention should be considered mitigation measure rather than enhancement. Additional planting would be supported as an enhancement measure.

Comment

Representation ID: 4433

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 079 - Do not consider retention of trees and hedgerows and enhancement measure - these are required mitigation. Additional planting would be considered enhancement and would be supported.

Comment

Representation ID: 4434

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 617 - Consider the retention of trees and hedgerows to be a required mitigation measure not an enhancement. Additional planting is supported as an enhancement measure.

Comment

Representation ID: 4435

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 016 - The policy clause on page 199 of the plan should relate to the need to retain the trees and hedgerow and incorporate enhancements to conserve the setting of Grade II listed farmhouse. How will the development conserve the listed building and provide positive management for its future.

Comment

Representation ID: 4436

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 274 - No references to mitigation measures in page 201 of the plan. Request appropriate mitigation measures are included within the proforma to ensure that harm to the Hillfort is avoided/minimised and that the HESA is used to inform this approach.

Comment

Representation ID: 4437

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 576 - Support the mitigation measures referenced on Page 202 of the plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 4438

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 239 - Recommend inclusion of a clause relating to the need for archaeological mitigation and investigation.

Comment

Representation ID: 4439

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 416/416a - setting of the Canal Conservation Area will need to be protected and archaeological investigation and mitigation will be required.

Comment

Representation ID: 4440

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 285 - Recommend a mitigation measure to retain the trees and hedgerows is included in policy criteria as recommended by HESA 2022.

Comment

Representation ID: 4441

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 562/415 - tree and hedgerow retention is a required mitigation measure not enhancement. Additional planting would be considered an enhancement and is supported.

Comment

Representation ID: 4442

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 459 - Trees and hedgerows should be retained as required mitigation rather than enhancement. Additional planting would be enhancements and supported.

Comment

Representation ID: 4443

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 463/284 - Tree and hedgerow retention is considered necessary, as is additional planting scheme to further protect the setting of heritage assets.

Comment

Representation ID: 4444

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 272 - Support exclusion of this site from the plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 4445

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 082 - Would be useful to include that the tree belt should be retained to protect historic landscape character and setting of heritage assets; additional planting scheme would be considered enhancement. Site would benefit from archaeological investigation and mitigation as set out in HESA 2022.

Comment

Representation ID: 4446

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 397 - Archaeological investigation and mitigation would also be beneficial.

Comment

Representation ID: 4447

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 251 - Trees and hedgerows should be retained as required mitigation, not enhancement. Additional planting would be considered enhancement and would be supported.

Comment

Representation ID: 4448

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 313 - Are there opportunities to bring the Grade II listed building in the vicinty of this site back into use as a positive strategy for the historic environment? Tree and hedgerow measures should be considered required mitigation not enhancement. Additional planting would be considered enhancement and would be supported.

Comment

Representation ID: 4449

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 379 - A mitigation measure for archaeological investigation and mitigation will be required. Support the need to retain the hedge boundaries and consider this a requirement of development.