Question 11

Object

Representation ID: 2245

Received: 13/11/2021

Respondent: Colin Quinton

HC3 - Disagrees that the proposed affordable housing is in fact affordable.

Object

Representation ID: 2256

Received: 05/11/2021

Respondent: Ms K Price

Does not believe there is an appropriate blend housing for new buyers or houses accessible for older people such as bungalows.
Current plans are not affordable homes.

Object

Representation ID: 2272

Received: 02/05/2022

Respondent: Mr Alan Preece

HC17 - 60m2 of open space per dwelling should be minimum.

No mention of accessible natural greenspaces within policy.

Unclear whether the plan intends to increase size of i54, if so this should be mapped.

Specific polices inc. design will need more quantification.

NB1 - weak. lack of wildlife sites is through lack of assessment not lack of habitat.

NB5 -7 - why are targets set to national targets and not above these.
NB7 should take into account poor sewage system locally resulting in river discharge.

Object

Representation ID: 2334

Received: 11/12/2021

Respondent: Dr R Painter

Policy areas appropriate. Actual policy content not supported.

HC1 - mix of housing will depend on location, infrastructure, and socio economic reasons.

HC3 - 30% affordable housing is too low for some locations.

Object

Representation ID: 2381

Received: 07/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs M Parrish

Asks is the housing filling a need.

Current housing developments have not provided affordable housing.
Proposed housing is unaffordable for first time buyers.
Current new builds that are empty because of high price.

Object

Representation ID: 2385

Received: 07/11/2021

Respondent: Miss Savannah Parrish

Proposed housing is not affordable for first time buyers.

Object

Representation ID: 2391

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Edward Parry

Current new housing standing empty due to high market prices.
New proposed housing is not affordable.

Object

Representation ID: 2418

Received: 05/12/2021

Respondent: Cllr A Peace

Current new housing not sold in Wombourne.
Already 11,000 vacant home in the West Midlands.
Greater need for a larger proportion of social housing and smaller units for first time buyers and young people who have grown up here but would not be able to afford a house.

Object

Representation ID: 2434

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Ms Sharon Phillips

Current developments with unsold hosing due to premium house prices.
Proposed housing is not affordable forcing local people to by elsewhere.

Object

Representation ID: 2446

Received: 10/12/2021

Respondent: Ms Elaine Piper

There are houses from new development that haven't sold as they are not affordable.
New proposed housing isn't affordable.

Object

Representation ID: 2513

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Ms Shellee Phipps

Lack of affordable housing being proposed - should be a higher percentage.
Current housing developments do not provide enough affordable housing.
If allocations are built immediately will there be new housing need calculations in 2026 equating to further growth.
HC1 - There ha snot been enough affordable housing proposed in these major developments. 80% of properties are on major developments.
HC2 - watered down the 35 dwelling per hectare requirements in the GBMHA. - most sites in the local plan are the low 20s.
Leads to greater loss of green belt.
HC3 - developers should provide a higher proportion of social rent homes and starter homes that are affordable for first time buyers.

Object

Representation ID: 2591

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Rhys Crane

The need for Affordable housing is not being fulfilled.
30% affordable housing (at site 582) is not enough.
Majority of housing is not affordable.

Object

Representation ID: 2726

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs Laura Smith

The houses being built is not affordable housing for new starter families with lower incomes.
Only 31% of recent developments have been affordable.
Need more affordable homes, homes for young families, specialist homes for older people wanting to downsize.
75% will be market value. These houses are over-priced and no reflective for local need.

Object

Representation ID: 2738

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs S Steele

A significant of new development properties are still unsold, there is no demand for them.
Not affordable housing.

Object

Representation ID: 2739

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Mr James Steele

A significant of new development properties are still unsold, there is no demand for them.
Not affordable housing.

Object

Representation ID: 2760

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs Nicola Sprigg

A significant of new development properties are still unsold, there is no demand for them.
Not affordable housing.

Object

Representation ID: 2767

Received: 05/12/2021

Respondent: Mr John Steventon

The only houses that should be build should be for young locals that of the character of the village.

Object

Representation ID: 2770

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Ms Libby Stewart

A significant of new development properties are still unsold, there is no demand for them.
Not affordable housing.

Object

Representation ID: 2830

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Jordan Smith

There are already significant numbers of unsold houses on new developments.
Development are not affordable, or desirable.
Suggests creating a town like Perton instead of adding onto existing villages.

Object

Representation ID: 2835

Received: 04/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Nigel Smith

The homes on the site will not be affordable, first buy homes.

Object

Representation ID: 2909

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Mr P Stewart

Proposed housing is not affordable.
There are currently plenty of homes for sale (significant number of these are new builds).

Object

Representation ID: 2957

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Ms Vanessa Maher-Smith and Quinn Smith

Enough housing in Wombourne for sale. A significant number of new development housing is still for sale - proof are not desirable.
Proposed and current new builds are not affordable.
Could Consider empty Dwelling Management Orders - this has worked for Wolverhampton in the past.

Object

Representation ID: 2960

Received: 03/12/2021

Respondent: Ms Caroline Marks

Proposed and current new builds are not affordable.
Could Consider empty Dwelling Management Orders - this has worked for Wolverhampton in the past.

Object

Representation ID: 2969

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Mr James Marston

There are currently many new developments in Wombourne that remain unsold.
Building on the land that these developers have sold as natural surroundings.
Proposed and current ne development houses are not affordable.

Object

Representation ID: 3002

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Mr C Stonehouse

IDP needs re-examination.
H2C - 35dw/ha should be lower, density of current developments is too high creating issues with parking/traffic.
HC11, HC17, EC10 - a reduction in open space is not acceptable, should be more space around a dwelling not less.
Use of River Penk Flood plain, parkland and nature reserve is not acceptable to offset the provision of open space- they are not usable open spaces and act as visual amenity space and SUD areas.
S106 agreements HC11 - S106 agreement allows for POS and play areas to be retained by developers and not taken into public ownership.
Very little evidence to show growth in employment or amenities in The PLR for Penkridge to the north.

Object

Representation ID: 3011

Received: 24/11/2021

Respondent: Mr D Miles

Proposed housing is not affordable.
There are currently plenty of homes for sale (significant number of these are new builds).

Object

Representation ID: 3013

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs P Miles

Proposed housing is not affordable.
There are currently plenty of homes for sale (significant number of these are new builds).

Object

Representation ID: 3039

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs Rachael Mulvihill

The houses will not be affordable for first time buyers.
Only 15% of homes will be socially rented properties.

Object

Representation ID: 3045

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Mr D Muir

Large proportion of the proposed housing isn't affordable for local people, first homes buyers/ retirement homes. - Real housing needs of the county are not being met.

Object

Representation ID: 3164

Received: 10/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs C Nutting

The proposed housing is not affordable.
Will these be sustainable development housing - solar panels/ ground heat pumps?