Preferred Options November 2021

Search representations

Results for Trebor Developments search

New search New search

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 8

Representation ID: 1577

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Trebor Developments

Agent: Avison Young

Representation Summary:

Support the allocation of land south of White Hill, Kinver (site 274) for residential development.
The site is available with a willing seller and market interest, is suitable adjacent to Kinver development boundary and within walking distance of village amenities with public transport connections.
Highways work indicates that development of c.130 dwellings would not have unacceptable/adverse impacts upon local highways or Potters Cross junction.
Trebor Developments are happy to work with Highways to address concerns relating to local highway including Potters Cross junction and will assist in delivering improvements to junction operation(s)/sustainable travel to school options.
Minimum of 82 dwellings identified is suitable.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 5

Representation ID: 1579

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Trebor Developments

Agent: Avison Young

Representation Summary:

Support the proposals to bring forward previously identified safeguarded land for residential development in order to build in greater flexibility into the plan which is not going to be secured in the short/medium term through a new settlement.

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 5

Representation ID: 1581

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Trebor Developments

Agent: Avison Young

Representation Summary:

Strategic Growth Study does not consider potential impact of "35% urban uplift" in the calculation of housing need thus increasing the HMA shortfall. More flexibility should be built into meeting future development needs.
Table 8 - although demonstrates a 13% 'buffer' - is not a sufficient demonstration of proposed allocations providing a rolling 5YHLS at adoption.

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 8

Representation ID: 1586

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Trebor Developments

Agent: Avison Young

Representation Summary:

Land south of White Hill, Kinver should be allocated for residential development of be safeguarded for future residential development.
Typographical error on Locality 5 growth plan at paragraph 4.41 - land south of White Hill is for min. 120 dwellings not 118 as written.
Site 273 (land north of White Hill) is available with a willing seller and market interest, is suitable adjacent to Kinver development boundary and within walking distance of village amenities with public transport connections.
Part of Site KV13 of the Landscape Sensitivity Study which is being promoted for residential development scores as 'low' landscape sensitivity.
2014 GB assessment notes that site 273 (land north of White Hill) makes limited contribution to GB purposes which is of a lower impact than site 576 (proposed for allocation).
Site 273 (land north of White Hill) has now overcome accessibility issues which prevented it from being allocated through the SAD. Trebor Developments also exploring opportunities to improve pedestrian accessibility between the site and Kinver village centre.
Site 273 (land north of White Hill) should be allocated for residential development or safeguarded for future needs.

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 1

Representation ID: 1599

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Trebor Developments

Agent: Avison Young

Representation Summary:

Housing Site Selection Topic Paper should note that SAD Site 274 does now have permission as the S106 was agreed on 14 September 2021.

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 11

Representation ID: 1600

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Trebor Developments

Agent: Avison Young

Representation Summary:

Policy HC11 - the Council should provide evidence of justifiable need for application of Nationally Described Internal Space Standards to all new housing developments in the District.
Policies HC14, HC15 and HC18 should make specific reference to CIL Regulation 122 tests for planning obligations to ensure all requests for financial contributions are lawful and comply with national policy.
Policy HC17 should allow for equipped play provision off site in circumstances where there is existing public open space or play facilities available within walking distance of the site that would benefit from financial contribution.

If you are having trouble using the system, please try our help guide.