Preferred Options November 2021
Search representations
Results for Trebor Developments search
New searchSupport
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 8
Representation ID: 1577
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Trebor Developments
Agent: Avison Young
Support the allocation of land south of White Hill, Kinver (site 274) for residential development.
The site is available with a willing seller and market interest, is suitable adjacent to Kinver development boundary and within walking distance of village amenities with public transport connections.
Highways work indicates that development of c.130 dwellings would not have unacceptable/adverse impacts upon local highways or Potters Cross junction.
Trebor Developments are happy to work with Highways to address concerns relating to local highway including Potters Cross junction and will assist in delivering improvements to junction operation(s)/sustainable travel to school options.
Minimum of 82 dwellings identified is suitable.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 5
Representation ID: 1579
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Trebor Developments
Agent: Avison Young
Support the proposals to bring forward previously identified safeguarded land for residential development in order to build in greater flexibility into the plan which is not going to be secured in the short/medium term through a new settlement.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 5
Representation ID: 1581
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Trebor Developments
Agent: Avison Young
Strategic Growth Study does not consider potential impact of "35% urban uplift" in the calculation of housing need thus increasing the HMA shortfall. More flexibility should be built into meeting future development needs.
Table 8 - although demonstrates a 13% 'buffer' - is not a sufficient demonstration of proposed allocations providing a rolling 5YHLS at adoption.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 8
Representation ID: 1586
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Trebor Developments
Agent: Avison Young
Land south of White Hill, Kinver should be allocated for residential development of be safeguarded for future residential development.
Typographical error on Locality 5 growth plan at paragraph 4.41 - land south of White Hill is for min. 120 dwellings not 118 as written.
Site 273 (land north of White Hill) is available with a willing seller and market interest, is suitable adjacent to Kinver development boundary and within walking distance of village amenities with public transport connections.
Part of Site KV13 of the Landscape Sensitivity Study which is being promoted for residential development scores as 'low' landscape sensitivity.
2014 GB assessment notes that site 273 (land north of White Hill) makes limited contribution to GB purposes which is of a lower impact than site 576 (proposed for allocation).
Site 273 (land north of White Hill) has now overcome accessibility issues which prevented it from being allocated through the SAD. Trebor Developments also exploring opportunities to improve pedestrian accessibility between the site and Kinver village centre.
Site 273 (land north of White Hill) should be allocated for residential development or safeguarded for future needs.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 1
Representation ID: 1599
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Trebor Developments
Agent: Avison Young
Housing Site Selection Topic Paper should note that SAD Site 274 does now have permission as the S106 was agreed on 14 September 2021.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 11
Representation ID: 1600
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Trebor Developments
Agent: Avison Young
Policy HC11 - the Council should provide evidence of justifiable need for application of Nationally Described Internal Space Standards to all new housing developments in the District.
Policies HC14, HC15 and HC18 should make specific reference to CIL Regulation 122 tests for planning obligations to ensure all requests for financial contributions are lawful and comply with national policy.
Policy HC17 should allow for equipped play provision off site in circumstances where there is existing public open space or play facilities available within walking distance of the site that would benefit from financial contribution.