Preferred Options November 2021

Search representations

Results for Boningale Homes ltd. search

New search New search

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 3

Representation ID: 1536

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Boningale Homes ltd.

Agent: Alder King

Representation Summary:

Should be greater assessment of lower Tier settlements (e.g. Oaken) to contribute to housing requirement.
Further site specific GB assessment should be undertaken to look at individual land parcels.

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 8

Representation ID: 1537

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Boningale Homes ltd.

Agent: Alder King

Representation Summary:

Smaller appropriately sized sites around lower tier settlements with good connections to higher tier (1) settlements should be considered.
Site Parcels 1, 2, 3 at Oaken could contribute to the housing supply as; they are well connected to Codsall, are within a parcel of land that scores well against the purposes of GB (not negatively impacting GB integrity) within the GB review, and is adjacent Oaken DB.
Oaken parcels should be allocated for development or be safeguarded for future residential development.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 5

Representation ID: 1538

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Boningale Homes ltd.

Agent: Alder King

Representation Summary:

Support the classification of Codsall/Bilbrook as Tier 1 settlement.

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 5

Representation ID: 1539

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Boningale Homes ltd.

Agent: Alder King

Representation Summary:

An appropriate level of growth can be facilitated in settlements lower down the hierarchy which have close ties to higher tier settlements.
Further growth should be directed towards Codsall/Bilbrook beyond proposals in Policies SA1 and SA5.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 7

Representation ID: 1540

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Boningale Homes ltd.

Agent: Alder King

Representation Summary:

Support the strategic development locations and that they will be guided by their own policies and design guides to ensure appropriate development.

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 7

Representation ID: 1541

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Boningale Homes ltd.

Agent: Alder King

Representation Summary:

Smaller sites that can be delivered sooner than strategic sites should be allocated to provide immediate housing delivery and bridge the gap between strategic sites coming online.

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 3

Representation ID: 1548

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Boningale Homes ltd.

Agent: Alder King

Representation Summary:

Should be further assessment of sites adjacent to Tier 1 settlements that could provide appropriate development opportunities.
Site specific GB assessment should be undertaken to look at individual land parcels.

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 8

Representation ID: 1549

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Boningale Homes ltd.

Agent: Alder King

Representation Summary:

Land off Heath House Lane should be allocated for residential development of be safeguarded for future residential development.
Disagree with the 2019 GB Review which considers development at land off Heath House Lane would result in moderate-high harm.
Noted that land off Heath House Lane was rated identically to housing allocation 419; as such, land off Heath House Lane should be reassessed against GB evidence.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 5

Representation ID: 1550

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Boningale Homes ltd.

Agent: Alder King

Representation Summary:

Support the proposals to bring forward previously identified safeguarded land for residential development.
Support principle spatial aim to direct growth to accessible/sustainable locations based upon Settlement hierarchy.

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Question 5

Representation ID: 1554

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Boningale Homes ltd.

Agent: Alder King

Representation Summary:

Further growth should be attributed to Codsall/Bilbrook beyond current proposals in policies SA1 and SA5 to ensure confidence in housing delivery as scale of uplift based on historic trends causes concern, and safeguard land for next LP review.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.