Publication Plan November 2022

Object

Representation ID: 4117

Received: 14/12/2022

Respondent: D Morgan PLC

Agent: Peacock and Smith

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to limited growth at Tier 1 Cheslyn Hay/Great Wylrey contrary to Strategic Objective 2. In contrast significnt growth at strategic allocations (SA2 and SA3) are proposed in Tier 3 Essington and Coven. This is contrary to 2002 Structure Plan High Court judgment that found Cheslyn Hay a sustainable location for growth, in contrast to Essington.

Strategy has failed to take account of electrification of the Chase Line and accessibility to other public transport and services and facilities.Accessibility mapping used for the Rural Services and Facilities Audit uses 2017 baseline and does not factor in these upgrades to the line. Fails to meet NPPF para 124 requirements for prioritizing PDL or areas well serviced by public transport when considering Green Belt release. Also conflict with NPPFs paras 11, 16, 105, 110 which seek to align growth with infrastructure.

Object

Representation ID: 4118

Received: 14/12/2022

Respondent: D Morgan PLC

Agent: Peacock and Smith

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Sustainable development should utilise public transport, provide a genuine choice of transport modes - Site SA2 fails to achieve this. Allocated in a rural location for significant growth despite being in Tier 3 Coven. Site is remote from any railway stations, not within Cannock Town Centre Catchment Area or Travel Zone, and only served by a very limited bus service. Does not meet NPPF para 142 requirements for Green Belt release.

Object

Representation ID: 4119

Received: 14/12/2022

Respondent: D Morgan PLC

Agent: Peacock and Smith

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Sustainable development should utilise public transport, provide a genuine choice of transport modes - Site SA3 fails to achieve this. Allocated in a rural location for significant growth despite being in Tier 3 Essington. Site is remote from any railway stations, not within Cannock Town Centre Catchment Area or Travel Zone, and only served by a very limited bus service. Does not meet NPPF para 142 requirements for Green Belt release.

Object

Representation ID: 4120

Received: 14/12/2022

Respondent: D Morgan PLC

Agent: Peacock and Smith

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Yes

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Site 116 and 131 could be developed on an equivalent basis to Coven or Essington whilst incorporating significant areas of landscaping and tree planting with footpath / cycle links from the site connecting to Campions Wood, Plum Wood, Strawberry Wood, the Forest of Mercia Way and existing footpath / cycle network in Cheslyn Hay including to Landywood Station on the Chase Line.Sites 116 and 131 can access a number of services and facilities by pedestrian and cycle routes in addition to a choice of public transport modes, both bus and rail with interconnectivity including accessing a Bus Station in Cannock Town Centre within 10-15 minutes for onward journeys within the Travel Zone. Sites are adjacent a Tier 1 settlement that was considered highly sustainable in 2002 High Court judgment.