Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1777
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: St Philips
HC1 – Have concerns with inflexibility of policy. Market and affordable mixes by dwelling size should be included in policy and should reflect more up-to-date information where available. The approach isn’t flexible to respond to needs of different sub areas.
HC7 – Support the flexible approach adopted in the policy. Policy should explicitly set out evidence against which it would determine an ‘identified need’ to exist. The Council should publish annual data on level of demand and how it has met its statutory duty to provide suitable plots and reflect these in the draft policy.
HC11 – Support the principle of NDSS but only if the Council provides a local assessment evidencing the case for NDSS in accordance with the NPPF/PPG.
HC12 – Disagree with the proposed parking standards. Given the variety in future chargers and the need for flexibility the priority should be for the relevant cabling to be installed, not specific chargers.