Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 258
Received: 23/11/2021
Respondent: Ms Claire Jones
Representation Summary:
I do not agree with meeting unmet needs of GBHMA when they are awash with Brownfield sites. It should not be the case that residents of SSDC suffer loss of amenity because the cost of developing brownfield sites is higher, and therefore impacting profit for developers. I do not agree that the availability of sites in GBHMA has fallen. I believe the availability of profitable sites may have fallen, but I do not believe it is in the interests of SSDC residents to provide the profits for developers