Policy SA6: Gypsy and Traveller Allocations

Comment

Representation ID: 3991

Received: 23/11/2022

Respondent: Inland Waterways Association (IWA)

Gypsy and Traveller sites GT05 Granary Cottage and GT23 Glenside are both within sight of the Staffordshire & Worcestershire Canal Conservation Area and the Key Requirements of pitch positioning and of tree and hedge boundary reinforcement to protect the setting of the listed canal bridge and the Conservation Area are supported. GT08 Brinsford Bridge is directly canalside and has a history of ignoring planning conditions so the Key Requirement to establish a hedged boundary along the canal bank should be enforced.

Note that Inset Plan 51 wrongly labels site GT23 as GT05, and site GT05 is not labelled.

Object

Representation ID: 4041

Received: 06/12/2022

Respondent: Mrs K Mottram

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Ruining of local countryside

Object

Representation ID: 4056

Received: 15/11/2022

Respondent: Mr Mike Woodall

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Object to granting permanency to traveller sites which were initially illegal and subsequently granted temporary status

Object

Representation ID: 4069

Received: 11/12/2022

Respondent: J Richardson

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Plots for travellers should be completely abolished.

Comment

Representation ID: 4227

Received: 20/12/2022

Respondent: Penkridge Parish Council

Concerns that the A449 Traveller site is to made permanent this has already been rejected since 2009 and should continue to be part of the Green Belt

Support

Representation ID: 4315

Received: 20/12/2022

Respondent: Cannock Chase Council

The approach to continue to deliver privately owned sites/pitches to meet the needs of existing gypsy and traveller families is supported.

Comment

Representation ID: 4453

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site GT01 - Tree and hedgerows should be retained but this is considered a mitigation requirement rather than enhancement. Additional planting would be supported as an enhancement measure.

Comment

Representation ID: 4454

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site GT05 - Concerns regarding Canal Conservation Area and Listed Bridge. Additional detail is required about how a development can come forward and minimse its harm on the historic environment.

Comment

Representation ID: 4455

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site GT06 - Tree and hedgerows should be retained but this is considered a mitigation requirement rather than enhancement. Additional planting would be supported as an enhancement measure.

Comment

Representation ID: 4456

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site GT07 - Tree and hedgerows should be retained but this is considered a mitigation requirement rather than enhancement. Additional planting would be supported as an enhancement measure.

Comment

Representation ID: 4457

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site GT08 - Support the mitigation measures set out on page 228 of the plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 4458

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site GT14 - Tree and hedgerows should be retained but this is considered a mitigation requirement rather than enhancement. Additional planting would be supported as an enhancement measure.

Comment

Representation ID: 4459

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site GT17 - Support the retention of trees and hedgerows

Comment

Representation ID: 4460

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site GT18 - Support the retention of the trees and hedgerows.

Comment

Representation ID: 4461

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site GT23 - Support the retention of existing tree and hedgerow planting. Additional planting will be necessary to protect the existing character of the Canal Conservation Area.

Comment

Representation ID: 4462

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site GT32 - Support the retention of the tree lined boundaries.

Comment

Representation ID: 4463

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site GT33 - Further additional planting will be necessary to protect the existing character of the Canal Conservation Area

Comment

Representation ID: 4465

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site GT34 - We consider further additional planting will be necessary to protect the existing character of the Canal Conservation Area.

Comment

Representation ID: 4466

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site GT35 - Additional planting will be necessary to protect the existing character of the Canal Conservation Area.

Comment

Representation ID: 4730

Received: 23/12/2022

Respondent: National Highways

Details on these smaller sites will be required in terms of boundary treatments to the SRN and National Highways should be consulted at an early stage in the planning application process to ensure appropriate assessments in accordance with DFT 02/2013 and the DMRB to identify the need for and form of any SRN mitigation. Details of boundary treatments to SRN will be required.