Preferred Options November 2021
Search representations
Results for Canal & River Trust search
New searchObject
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 1
Representation ID: 1936
Received: 29/03/2022
Respondent: Canal & River Trust
Map 1 should be amended to include the existing navigational canals.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 5
Representation ID: 1937
Received: 29/03/2022
Respondent: Canal & River Trust
When considering growth options it is important that the impact on the canal towpath network of additional users is considered and mitigation measures incorporated to promote active travel.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 7
Representation ID: 1938
Received: 29/03/2022
Respondent: Canal & River Trust
Policy SA1 - Canal & Rivers Trust wish to be included as a stakeholder in production of SPD.
Highlight canal and river in blue on allocation plan.
Include canal in masterplanning of proposed Barnhurst Lane access.
Masterplan should retain rural character of the canal setting.
Upgrade towpath from Pendeford Bridge to Autherley Junction to support additional use and promote active travel.
Discharge storm water into Moat Brook rather than River Penk, Pendeford Aquaduct is more likely to have better capacity for increased discharge than the culvert at Wolverhampton boat club.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 7
Representation ID: 1939
Received: 29/03/2022
Respondent: Canal & River Trust
Policy SA2 - Canal & Rivers Trust wish to be included as a stakeholder in production of SPD.
Maintain the rural character of the canal Conservation Area. Further strategic landscaping to the north of the existing identified area would provide an appropriate rural buffer to the canal corridor.
Towpath would benefit from upgrading of the surfacing and access points to provide a towpath of rural character capable of supporting increased use.
Possibility of discharging attenuated water into the canal which is higher up the drainage hierarchy.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 7
Representation ID: 1940
Received: 29/03/2022
Respondent: Canal & River Trust
Policy SA4
Canal & River Trust wish to be included as a stakeholder in production of SPD.
Connectivity between the site and the canal via bridleway, this provides an off-road route into Penkridge village and towpath would benefit from upgrading.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 8
Representation ID: 1941
Received: 29/03/2022
Respondent: Canal & River Trust
Policy SA5
Site 079 - Need to ensure that surface water drainage does not discharge towards the canal.
Site 005 - Add heritage impact mitigation to the key infrastructure requirements for this site in relation to the canal conservation area.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 9
Representation ID: 1949
Received: 29/03/2022
Respondent: Canal & River Trust
GT08 - Mitigate visual impact on canal Conservation Area. Foul and Surface water need to be located away from the canal infrastructure.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 10
Representation ID: 1950
Received: 29/03/2022
Respondent: Canal & River Trust
Note the retention of the canal Conservation Area within the Green Belt.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 11
Representation ID: 1951
Received: 29/03/2022
Respondent: Canal & River Trust
Policy EC11 - More emphasis should be given to the potential for towpaths to be used as off-road active travel routes which offers direct links into the West Midlands conurbation.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Question 11
Representation ID: 1952
Received: 29/03/2022
Respondent: Canal & River Trust
Policy NB7 - Management of water to avoid increased flooding is a key challenge. Additional works may be necessary and updated breach models may be required.