Publication Plan November 2022

Support

Representation ID: 4381

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

We welcome reference to the historic environment in the introductory paragraphs.

Support

Representation ID: 4382

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Welcome consideration of the historic environment as a key issue

Support

Representation ID: 4383

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Welcome recognition of the historic environment as a key issue in Table 5

Support

Representation ID: 4384

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Welcome Strategic Objective 13 within Table 6

Comment

Representation ID: 4386

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Under list of constraints please amend 'historic assets' to 'heritage assets' to reflect terminology within the NPPF

Comment

Representation ID: 4387

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Welcome policy but require reference within the policy to the need to conserve the significance of heritage assets,including their setting, as a specific bullet point.

Object

Representation ID: 4391

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Clause within policy relating to historic environment needs to be site specific rather than referring to a separate document - this is not a sound approach. We would require any application to be supported by archaeological investigations (pre-determination) so that the design of the scheme and archaeological mitigation can address the significance and importance of remains. We would require this to be set out in policy.

Object

Representation ID: 4392

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Clause within policy relating to historic environment needs to be site specific rather than referring to a separate document - this is not a sound approach. Request that the specific mitigation measures are incorporated into the policy wording and amend existing wording from 'preserving and potentially enhancing tree and hedge boundaries' to 'conserve existing tree and hedge boundaries and enhance their provision to...'

Object

Representation ID: 4394

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Clause within policy relating to historic environment needs to be site specific rather than referring to a separate document - this is not a sound approach. Clause (g) should set out the specific mitigation measures, including that planning applications should include both details to address the physical protection of the non-designated moat from damage but also a positive management plan for its conservation, inlcuding its setting relationship with the nearby Scheduled Moat site. Further given the setting of the Shropshire Union Canal Conservation Area the mitigation measures for retaining existing tree and hedgerows is essential and additional planting will be an enhancement opportunity.

Object

Representation ID: 4395

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Clause within policy relating to historic environment needs to be site specific rather than referring to a separate document - this is not a sound approach. Clause (h) should include specific mitigation measures, there is no reference to historic environment in the reasoned justification text attached to the policy.