Publication Plan November 2022

Support

Representation ID: 4409

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Support the inclusion of this policy

Object

Representation ID: 4412

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? Not specified

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Do not consider it sound to exclude historic environment for the 'catch all' clause in the site proformas in Appendix C. Recommend a more consistent approach to the HESA recommendations regarding tree and hedgerow retention, which requires the retention of existing trees and hedgerows, supports additional planting and landscaping as an enhancement measure and sets out why the retention is required to ensure that it is fully understood by prospective developers (i.e. along the lines of comments for Site 379 on page 220 of the Plan). We support the removal of sites from the plan that scored a 'red' in the assessment.

Comment

Representation ID: 4418

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 224 - The retention of trees and hedgerows as well as additional planting will be required to mitigate the harm to he Conservation Area and protect existing historic character

Comment

Representation ID: 4419

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 419a&b - incorporate a mitigation measure about the archaeological investigation/mitigation measure as well as an explanation in the policy text as to why the retention of the tree and hedgerow boudnaries, in line with the HESA 2022 report

Comment

Representation ID: 4422

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 119a - Recommend adding a sentence that relates to the retention of the trees and hedgerow being necessary to conserve the existing historic character

Comment

Representation ID: 4423

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 523 - There is no reference in the plan in Appendix C under Site 523 to any of the mitigation measures identified in the HESA 2022 report, which we require to be included in the plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 4424

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 141 - request a clause that states archaeological investigation will be required pre-determination to understand what is present, prior to develpoment and inform the design of the site.

Comment

Representation ID: 4425

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 136 - Request that there is inclusion of the need for potential archaeological investigation on the site to understand the significance of finds and understand how development may come forward. Request the use of the term 'interpretation boards' in enhancement measures.

Comment

Representation ID: 4426

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 139 - The retention of trees on the site are required and form a mitigation measure rather than enhancement. Request deletion of 'wherever possible' in the table on page 187.

Comment

Representation ID: 4427

Received: 22/12/2022

Respondent: Historic England

Site 704 - Request a clause to be included with regards to archaeological investigation and mitigation based on HESA 2022 report