Question 7

Object

Representation ID: 2028

Received: 11/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs A Williams

Objects to the proposed development in Linthouse Lane (SA3)

Loss of wildlife, biodiversity, ecosystem and environment.

Do not have the appropriate infrastructure such as schools and doctors.

Increased traffic and congestion

Linthouse Lane is prone to flooding.

Support

Representation ID: 2030

Received: 14/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Nick Williams

Supports the decision to not include Radford Lane sites 350c and 350d.

Adds to rationale:
Does not follow NPPF's green belt regulations.
Local amenities such a schools, doctor's surgeries running at full capacity.

Support

Representation ID: 2039

Received: 14/12/2021

Respondent: Ms Gloria Walmsley

In support of not including Radford Lane in the proposals.
Would like to add to the rationale of this:
Preceptive right of way by many local residents.
Highways issues such as section of the road around the proposed development will need to be widened to 6m and a sidewalk would have to be put in.

Support

Representation ID: 2063

Received: 11/04/2022

Respondent: Together Active

Support proposal to have site specific SPD's.

Object

Representation ID: 2064

Received: 11/04/2022

Respondent: Together Active

Suggest use of guidance 'Manual for Streets' and 'Manual for Streets 2' when considering detailed masterplan and design codes.
Recommend that Sports England Active Design principles should be formally adopted within any new SPD's.

Support

Representation ID: 2077

Received: 14/12/2021

Respondent: Matthew Williams

Supports the chose to not identify sites 350c and 350d on Radford Lane as preferred options.

Highways issues, already problematic traffic.
No local infrastructure to support residents this would prompt unsustainable dependency on traveling by car.

Object

Representation ID: 2105

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Daniel Williams

Observations regarding PO policy SA2 Site 082.

Critical the plan facilitates the new parking provision at SA2 and should be a guarantee with a housing trigger. This would provide crucial infrastructure for access to the railway for all local villages.
New settlement will erode the openness between settlements of Coven, Featherstone, Shareshill and the West Mids.
Impact the local playing field and children playing equipment. Will these be replaces or revised elsewhere?
Is the depiction accurately showing the amount of green belt that will be developed on?
Highways issues, road are narrow and do not facilitate two way traffic, increases traffic is not suitable for these roads.
(reference to an attached satellite image) Road Hazard 1: what will be done to facilitate improved visibility and safety on this corner for pedestrians and motorists.
(reference to an attached satellite image) Road Hazard 2: Will the road be widened?
Speed reduction tables should be input to the north to match those already existing.
Instillation and integration of a footpath from site allocation onto the A449 foot/cycle may be highly advantageous.
Landscape mitigation: the new site will be in direct view of those living in Standeford. Therefore the land north of the allocation should be planted to enable the development to bed into the landscape.

Object

Representation ID: 2125

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Ms Alison Bennett

OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED SITES 284, 285, 415, 416, 459, 462 & 562

Over stretched Infrastructure – GP Practices / Schools / / transport / roads and traffic / leisure centre

Destroying Natural Habitats

Urban Sprawl

Local flooding

Object

Representation ID: 2126

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Alex Bennett

Object to 463 & 284, 285, 286, 416, 459, 562/415 in Wombourne.

The development of the Green Belt land is contrary to the ethos of governmental policy and further development will ultimately lead to the loss of the village's rural identity.

Local of infrastructure and local services.

Constant development over 40 years affecting the nature of the village.

Already issues with traffic and local flood on Gilbert Lane and Pool House Lane

New homes in sites 463 and 459 would be built in the vicinity of very high voltage overhead electric transmission lines.

Object

Representation ID: 2127

Received: 07/12/2021

Respondent: Diana Bennett

Please address road safety improvements and necessary infrastructure, schools and Doctors before considering more new developments. The existing plans and previous developments are already putting the residents of Codsall at risk.

Object

Representation ID: 2128

Received: 28/11/2021

Respondent: Stacie Birks

Objects to Linthouse Lane, Site 486c.
Impact on Wildlife- loss of wildlife
Noise and pollution created due to building works.
Loss of Green Space

Object

Representation ID: 2136

Received: 07/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Stephen Blakemore

Impact on Highways - increased traffic volumes, air quality issues, condition of roads
Impact on education - access to places, schools already struggling for places.
Impact on healthcare services - overwhelmed services already.
Loss of habitat - forces wildlife into suburban areas, creates issues with rats, mice, foxes.
Loss of good quality farmland - land to grow crops needed to feed population.

Object

Representation ID: 2141

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Peter Bennett

Objections with specifics regarding sites: 284, 285, 415, 416, 459, 462 & 562

Lack of services such as GP practices and schools within the Wombourne area. The existing infrastructure already is over stretched and more housing allowing an increase in the local population would require new services. Concerns into the lack of investment which would need to be put into the Wombourne area.

Himley Meadows housing estate have not sold all of their homes and the site developers have no provided money towards expanding services within the area.

Lack on transport links such as bus and rail network within the Wombourne area. All main routes out of Wombourne via Pool house or Billy Buns Lane causing traffic problems therefore, believe main routes in and out of Wombourne can not accommodate any further traffic.

The agricultural land needs to be preserved for farmers to make a living. Finding alternative land may lead to unemployment for some.

Object

Representation ID: 2145

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs Annmarie Betteley

Concerns into building on the Green belt which provides a boundary to Wombourne Village. Building on the boundary with result the green belt disappearing which will cause an urban sprawl where by Wombourne will no longer be considered as a village.

The green belt provides the District with nature and wildlife which will disappear if built on.

Lack of services within Wombourne as the schools and doctors are at full capacity. Providing more housing causing these services to be over stretched.

Object

Representation ID: 2146

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs Annmarie Betteley

Concerns into the flood risks of Wombourne as the majority of houses have no infrastructure for rain surface water causing a lot of flooding within the area. Building on the land will only cause more flooding within the village.

The traffic within Wombourne has became increasingly busy which causes a lot of air pollution. There are large HGV's which mount the footpaths which cause the local areas grass to be damaged. [See attached image]

Object

Representation ID: 2154

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs S Wilbrey

Objects to SA2 the land at Green Cross.
This this development has been in its planning for longer than the PO suggests.
Suggests landowners new about possible development prior to 2018.
The proposed area doesn't have many residents and therefore will not face the same scale of objection compared to other proposed developments.
Suggests development already had approval prior to PO.
Should be using brownfield sites.
Objects to building on the green belt.
Highways issues the roads adjoining the development are very busy with high speed traffic. Some residents have had cars go into there front gardens.
Disagrees with picking up the Black Country shortfall.

Object

Representation ID: 2171

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Wardle

Objects to the proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.
Impact the local wildlife and environment..
Loss of green space.
Highways issues such as increased traffic, increase in pollution.
Local infrastructure will be exacerbated with such increase in population.
Proposed area suffers from flooding, development is a natural drain.
Schools, local secondary schools are currently running at capacity.
The development issues such a s increased costs of schooling, healthcare and road maintenance will fall on Wolverhampton council tax payers not South Staffs.
Damaging effect on local populations metal health.

Object

Representation ID: 2173

Received: 19/11/2021

Respondent: Lisa Warrilow

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.
Impact on the local wildlife.
Loss of recreational space, for peoples metal health, dog walking and fishing.
Highways issues such as increased traffic and increased traffic incidents.
Prioritise building on brownfield sites.
Objects to building on the green belt.

Object

Representation ID: 2203

Received: 17/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs Donna Webster

Objects to development proposal at Linthouse Lane site SA3.
Alter the area and the amenity shared with Essington.
Brownfield sites should be identified and developed first, would like evidence to support this has been done.
Loss of local wildlife, habitat, natural light ad environment.
Preferred option has been written just for this land for site SA3 and not for any other site in the document.

Object

Representation ID: 2204

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Holly Westwood

Objects to the proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.

Highways issues such as increased traffic, road can't cope with such an increase in vehicles.
Impact on already strained schools, doctor's surgeries and hospitals.
Impact green belt bet land.
Loss/Impact of working farmland.
Impact on the wildlife, environment, and does not mitigate for climate change.
Utilise brown field sites first such as unused large offices left empty due to COVID.
Doesn't believe exceptional circumstances in order to build on green belt have been explained.
Impacts the public that use the field for recreational purpose and their well being.

Object

Representation ID: 2205

Received: 10/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs Shirley Westwood

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.

There are brownfield sites that should be explored, empty offices ect.
Objects to building on the green belt.
Highways issue, increase traffic and air pollution.
Loss of good farming land.
Proposed land prone to flood.
Impact on local schools, there are not enough spaces to accommodate number of new residents.
Residents will be paying South Staffs council tax but using Wolverhampton amenities.
Impact on already at capacity doctor's surgeries, further pressure on New Cross Hospital.
Loss of green space and recreational space for local residents.
Doesn't think exceptional circumstances have been met to justify building in the green belt.

Object

Representation ID: 2209

Received: 14/12/2021

Respondent: Ralph Webster

Comments on SA2 proposal site 646a and 646b Green Cross.

Suggests Coven offers large scale sites giving a more logical boundary to the village. Continue the Brewood Road development southward bounded by A449 and Lawn Lane. Or on the east of A449 use the land north of the Anchor Inn, Brewood Road. The area could be exteneded again from Old Stafford Road north toward Station Road.

Developing sites 646a and 646b loose the green buffer between South Saffs and Wolverhampton.

Will it be a truly sustainable community with attritive community hubs such as Coven, Featherstone and Oxley close. Increase traffic making area of the A449 more hazardous.

Will the proposed train station at Cats and Kittens Lane going to be built?

Highways Issues: traffic increase, road safety risks increase. Comprehensive traffic management is needed such as one way systems and prohibiting left and right turns.

Object

Representation ID: 2216

Received: 15/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Neil Wheeldon

Objects to the proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.

Opposes to building on the green belt.
There is brown sites available in Essington.
Plans from Wimpey show proposed development 'merge' with Essington (urbanisation).
Highways issues such as increased traffic and traffic incidents, foot path be put in.
Tree preservation on the site (they have been farming around these trees).
Impact on local schools already at capacity.

Object

Representation ID: 2225

Received: 01/12/2021

Respondent: Carol Blakemore

Objection to Linthouse Lane site allocation.
- Loss of Green Belt
- Brownfield sites should be used first
- Loss of open space
- Impact on local infrastructure- roads, sewerage, water, schools, shops and healthcare services have insufficient capacity.
- Environmental impact- increase pollution
-Landscape impact- increased urban sprawl impacting on rural surroundings.

Object

Representation ID: 2226

Received: 21/11/2021

Respondent: Miss Eva Blakemore

Objects to site 486c, Linthouse Lane
- Within the Greenbelt
-Loss of open space- used for recreation
- Impact on wildlife- loss of wildlife and habitats
- Impact on Highways- increased traffic
- Environmental impact- increased pollution due to additional traffic
- Impact on Healthcare services- lack of capacity
- Brownfield sites should be used before Greenbelt land
- Devaluation of existing properties.

Object

Representation ID: 2227

Received: 25/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs Julie Bloomer

Objects to Linthouse Lane Site.
- Within the Greenbelt
- Impact on Wildlife
- Highways issues- increased traffic on local roads.

Object

Representation ID: 2238

Received: 10/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs S Bonner

Objects to proposed development Linthouse Lane SA3.
Impacts to the environment.
Highways issue- excessive traffic, increase in pollution.
Loss of valuable agricultural land.
Loss of recreational and historic space.
Priorities brown filed sites before start developing green field sites.

Object

Representation ID: 2239

Received: 10/11/2021

Respondent: Janice Westley

Objects to proposed development Linthouse Lane SA3 site 486c.
Loss of productive agricultural land.
Loss of hedgerows, trees.
Build on brown field sites- Rosemary tiles land in Essington suggested.
Objects to proving shortfall housing for Birmingham.

Object

Representation ID: 2262

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Jayne Postins

Objects to proposed development in Linthouse Lane site 486c.
Objects to building on the green belt.
Brown belt sites should be developed first.

Object

Representation ID: 2263

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Kevin Postins

Objects to the proposed development at Linthouse Lane site 486c.

Objects to building on the green belt.
Brown field sites should be developed first.