Question 7

Object

Representation ID: 2481

Received: 05/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Martin Bradley

Loss of green belt - 'Joins' Essington to Wolverhampton, urbanisation.
Loss of public rights of way.
Impact on highways - increased traffic volumes, congestion especially around school hours.
Brownfield sites should be considered before any greenfield sites - protect countryside

Object

Representation ID: 2483

Received: 11/12/2021

Respondent: Niall Brady

Loss of green belt.
Loss of open space, used by many for walking.
Impact on wildlife.
Loss of good farmland- impact on farmers jobs
Urbanisation - all areas will look the same.

Object

Representation ID: 2492

Received: 16/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Peter Brewster

Loss of green belt -valuable to loacl people for leisure and well being.

Both access Kitchen Lane/Linthouse Lane under Wolverhampton Council

Object

Representation ID: 2501

Received: 02/11/2021

Respondent: Mr J R Rozier

Linthouse Lane

Exiting driveway onto Linthouse Lane already very dangerous and will be made worse.
Doctors and schools already beyond capacity.

Object

Representation ID: 2502

Received: 09/11/2021

Respondent: Mr A A Rudkin

Linthouse Lane

Live within 200 yards of greenbelt for 52 years.
Do not support loss of greenbelt.
Should be building on brownfield land.
Should think about environment for future generations, listen to findings in COP26.
Causing extra congestion and air pollution.

Object

Representation ID: 2503

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: C Rush

Roads and local people will not cope with huge increase in traffic.
Dangerous for children walking to school - a girl has died from petrol fumes walking to school.
Fields already flood and will be made much worse with impermeable surfaces - will cause serve flooding for houses on Linthouse Lane. See Photos.

Object

Representation ID: 2504

Received: 08/12/2021

Respondent: Ms Carol Russell

Linthouse Lane

Need greenspace for physical and mental wellbeing.
No capacity at local doctors, dentists and schools.
Sewage system will not cope.
Need to cut pollution not increase it.
Surrounding roads cannot cope with more traffic - will impact on Wolverhampton the most.
Should be building elsewhere..
Think about long term impact not just short term profit.

Object

Representation ID: 2506

Received: 09/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs G Russell

Linthouse Lane

Loss of countryside and views.
Loss of habitats and wildlife.
Bad for people's mental health.
Used by many locals - dog walkers, ramblers and visitors. Refuge in industrial area.
Should be building on brownfield.

Object

Representation ID: 2507

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs G Russell

Linthouse Lane

Loss of habitat and wildlife.
Loss of countryside.
Houses neglected in towns and run down that could be developed and reused effectively.
Damaging to mental health.
Used by a lot of people for exercise and dog walking.

Object

Representation ID: 2508

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs V Russell

Linthouse Lane.

Critisim of consultation document - jargon, questions are biased and difficult to use.
Essington population already gone up by 10%. Linthouse Lane doubles this.
Local plan should protect against overdevelopment.
Traffic issues on nearby roads.
Need new school in Essington.
Roads unsafe, particular for pedestirans including familes and children.
Construction traffic will worsen problem.
Should build on Wolverhampton brownfield, as Prime Minster says, such as area between Sneyd School and M6.
People's views in consultation process are ignored - tokenism.
Council should be duty bound to protect green belt and push alternatives.
Roads will not cope with huge increase in traffic volumes.
Lack of local employment and reliance on cars.
Threat this encroachment on greenbelt will go further.

Object

Representation ID: 2509

Received: 17/11/2021

Respondent: Mr & Mrs N Russell

Linthouse Lane.

This will create issues with traffic pollution, wildlife, natural drainage etc.
You need to stop this plan for the sake of all your residents.

Support

Representation ID: 2516

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Ms Shellee Phipps

b) yes.

Object

Representation ID: 2520

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Simon Whale

Objects to proposed development at Green Cross, SA2.

Highways issue: increase in traffic, roads not suitable for increase in traffic/ not safe for pedestrians.
Loss of agricultural land.
Loss of green spaces.
Increase in pollution (water).
Impact on wildlife and environment.
Development is too close to the prison - will dissuade future buyers of new properties.

Object

Representation ID: 2536

Received: 30/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Andrzej Rusyn

Linthouse Lane

All future building should focus on the huge amounts of brownfield land available and leave alone the pristine countryside that makes a huge difference to the welfare of those who live beside it.

Object

Representation ID: 2538

Received: 17/11/2021

Respondent: Ms Nicola Osborne

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.

Objects to building on the green belt.
Impact on the environment.
Highways issues: Increase traffic.
Increase in pollution.
Brown belt sites should be utilised first.

Object

Representation ID: 2565

Received: 22/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Steve Salter

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3, Site 486c.

Loss of agricultural land.
Local infrastructure (schools) and amenities will not cope with increased demand.
Highways issues: increase traffic, speeding, increases incidents.
Increase in pollution - effect peoples health.
Impact on wildlife and habitats.
Impact the limited sewage system./ drainage.
Flooding: proposed site and/or surrounding area floods.
Loss of green, recreational space.
Brownfield sites should be utilised first.
Proposed housing will not be affordable.
Object to building on green belt.

Object

Representation ID: 2574

Received: 23/11/2021

Respondent: Diane Saunders

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3, site 486c.

Highways issues, increased traffic and congestion through Essington, not suitable roads for increased traffic, poor road quality.

Object

Representation ID: 2584

Received: 09/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs B Tarbuck

Number of people: 2

Linthouse Lane

Additional traffic on Prestwood Rd West already very heavy following expansion of New Cross Hospital .
Traffic so bad have trouble reversing off drive as it is, particularly at rush house/school time.
Congestion and idling cause air pollution which enters the house, unable to open windows and is very noisy.

Object

Representation ID: 2585

Received: 01/12/2021

Respondent: S Tate

Number of people: 2

Linthouse Lane

Too much development in area, leading to loss of views and leisure amenity for local residents.
Loss of greenspace, essential for health and wellbeing as seen in pandemic.
Local roads overcrowded and will not cope with additional traffic volumes.
Lack of parking leading to pavement and road outside their house being crowded.
Road needed for emergency vehicles to New Cross hospital.
Hospital already at capacity.
Sewerage and drainage already over capacity cannot cope with more.
Wolverhampton City Council also got a development close by for 2000 homes.
Green belt is needed buffer.
Loss of habitat and wildlife.

Object

Representation ID: 2593

Received: 01/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs P Sayce

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.
Impact on already oversubscribed doctors and schools.
Impact on local Hospitals.
Loss of greens spaces.

Object

Representation ID: 2598

Received: 01/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Simon Brodie

Loss of Green belt - urban sprawl, should use brownfield sites instead, site provides locals a place for well being walks, clean air, wildlife.
Loss of habitat - currently site filled with wildlife.
Impact on Climate - this is a crop field
Impact on Highways - increased traffic volumes, road unable to cope
Impact on schools - local schools already oversubscribed
Impact on healthcare services - Local GPs have no room to expand. Hospital already cannot cope.
Demand on Infrastructure - Seven Trent already suffer from low water pressure due to demand.
Historical site lost - plaque mounting doesn't make up for the loss.
Site on A34 is better - from public transport, infrastructure, climate points of view.

Object

Representation ID: 2610

Received: 09/11/2021

Respondent: J Taylor

Linthouse Lane

Local infrastructure cannot support the development.
Contradicts COP26 objectives.
Loss of greenbelt.
Brownfield land should be used instead.

Object

Representation ID: 2622

Received: 04/12/2021

Respondent: Hilary Teague

Linthouse Lane

Linthouse Lane and Blackhalve Lane already extremely busy and more traffic will be horrendous.
Fields flood already.
Site has path on that is used by many walkers and residents.
Loss of habitat and damage to wildlife.
Proposal caused a lot of upset and anger.

Object

Representation ID: 2625

Received: 17/11/2021

Respondent: Ms D Thompson

Linthouse Lane

Loss of greenbelt would significantly alter area.
Development create congestion and traffic.
Brownfield should be developed instead.
Land used by walkers and is important for health and wellbeing.
Development will contribute to climate change.
Drainage issues.
Nature should be preserved for future generations.

Object

Representation ID: 2629

Received: 17/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Steven Thompson

Linthouse Lane

Greenspace needed for connection with nature and for residents mental health.
Loss of wildlife will be unmeasurable.
Should be building on brownfield sites.

Object

Representation ID: 2636

Received: 06/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs Helen Scott-Reed

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.

Objects to building on the green belt.
Impact on local wildlife and environment.
Loss of green spaces.
Poor access to public transport (trains).
Poor road network connecting site to Wolverhampton.
Increase in traffic.
Suggests Yeildfileds Farm as a site.
Impact on local doctors and pharmacies, already oversubscribed.
National Grid pylons run through the site.

Object

Representation ID: 2640

Received: 25/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Albert Shade

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.
Loss of green and recreational spaces.
Highways issues: increase in traffic and congestion. Increase in pollution.

Object

Representation ID: 2649

Received: 07/12/2021

Respondent: Ms Kirsty Shaw

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.

Increasing urban sprawl.
Impact on the nature corridor running close to the site.
Will essentially merge the two counties of South Staffs and Wolverhampton.
Impact on local wildlife, ecosystem, habitat (including newts) and environments.
Fields were the site of the Battle of Wodensfield.
Loss of green and recreational spaces.
Flooding: increase in already existing flooding (which has closed Linthouse road).
Low water pressure.
Highways issue: increase congestion, increase in speeding, increased danger to pedestrians, increased pollution.
Brown field sites should be used.
Impact on already oversubscribed doctors and schools.

Object

Representation ID: 2655

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs Margaret Shelley

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.
Highways issues: increase in traffic and congestion.
Loss of green recreational space.
Impact and strain on the healthcare and social services including local GPs and Hospitals.
Flooding: Linthouse Lane is known to flood.
Should utilise brownfield sites before pursuing green belt.
Objects to building on the green belt.

Object

Representation ID: 2659

Received: 10/12/2021

Respondent: Marian Shingler

Objects to proposed development Linthouse Lane SA3.

Impact on local wildlife, habitat.
Impact on views.
Highways issues: increased noise and air pollution, increased traffic and congestion.
Flooding: Linthouse Lane has suffered from flooding in the past.
Impact and overcrowded schools.
Impact on already oversubscribed doctor's surgeries.
Loss of productive arable land.