Question 7

Object

Representation ID: 3563

Received: 28/11/2021

Respondent: Lynsey Kumari

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.
Loss of green recreational spaces - negative impact on mental health.
Will have to travel to see protected areas of beauty.
Impact on wildlife and habitats.
Impact and increase of flooding and pollution.
Impact on Hospitals (Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust) and doctors - already at capacity.
Increase in crime - lack of/ police at capacity.
Facilities such as high schools, doctor, dentists, youth clubs would need to be provided as they are currently at capacity.
Highways Issues: the main roads surrounding the site are currently dangerous - increase in accidents; increase in traffic, increased pollution and illness related to this.
Loss of arable land.
Local property prices will be effected.
Effect small businesses.
Site is in a historic area - battles have occurred on the site and historical artefacts may be lost due to development.
Objects to building on green belt - removing the green boarder stopping conurbations merging.
Brownfield sites should be prioritised.

Object

Representation ID: 3616

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs Cheryl Kent

Linthouse Lane.

Increased traffic and pollution.
Need to provide more than 1 primary school, need secondary provision also.
Plans to provide 'necessary facilities' is too vague.
South Staffs get council tax but affects Wolverhampton facilities.
Footpaths are well used, will have a detrimental effect on wellbeing of residents to remove them.
Loss of wildlife.
Should be looking at brownfield.

Object

Representation ID: 3621

Received: 25/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs Maxine Kelly

Bilbrook.

Pendeford Mill Lane already congested.
Speeding traffic, not prevented by speed bumps.
Loss of wildlife.
Doctors and amenities already full.
Should build on brownfield.

Object

Representation ID: 3649

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Mr V Kelly

Sites 584 and 010 are incorrect and do not show the current development at Bloors and proposal from Cameron's Homes.
Anaerobic digester is not shown within the sites 584 an 010.
Green infrastructure shown is assumed will not be used to offset the provision of loacl open space provision.

b) Yes - DP and NP should not be prepared for the growth of Penkridge.
A DP or NP is required for North of Penkridge - for the use of the A449.
If future growth to the west feasible land should be planned in site 010 for the Western Spine.
A449 use should be changed through Penkridge to be safe for pedestrians and cyclists.

Object

Representation ID: 3677

Received: 07/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Chris Humpage

Linthouse Lane.
• Over development of site, without the extended infrastructure eg GP Surgery’s, hospitals, schools, policing
• Flooding concerns - already regular flooding on Ridge Lane and Linthouse Lane.
• Destruction of wildlife habit
• Removal of large local food production
• Traffic - surrounding roads will become a cut through with Linthouse Lane almost impassable due to the volume of traffic.
• Council tax from this development will be paid to South Staffs. Wolverhampton will not benefit from the extra funds to maintain the extra pressure on services / roads.

Object

Representation ID: 3678

Received: 07/12/2021

Respondent: D Humpage

Linthouse Lane.

Need extension of infrastructure also including GP, hospital, schools and policing.
Area prone to flooding.
Destruction of habitat.
Area heavy with traffic.
Council tax will go to South Staffs but pressure on Wolverhampton services.

Object

Representation ID: 3679

Received: 07/12/2021

Respondent: J Humpage

Need extension of infrastructure also including GP, hospital, schools and policing.
Area prone to flooding.
Destruction of habitat.
Area heavy with traffic.
Council tax will go to South Staffs but pressure on Wolverhampton services.

Object

Representation ID: 3686

Received: 17/11/2021

Respondent: Mr David Jackson

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.

Increase congestion.
Loss of green recreational space - a 'jewel'.
Impact on wildlife (some protected species) and habitat.

Object

Representation ID: 3710

Received: 02/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Nick Jones

Site 582.
Plans are very upsetting.
Field brings happiness to residents for scenery and walking.
Important green space in busy area.
Field part of character of area.
Will increase traffic futher.

Object

Representation ID: 3711

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: N Jones

Linthouse Lane.

Increase congestion.
Area prone to flooding.
Infrastructure overstretched e.g. doctors.
Should be building on greenfield sites.

Object

Representation ID: 3731

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: K E Jones

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.
Objects to building on the green belt - brownfield should be utilised.
Impact on the environment.
Impact on local infrastructure and services.
Increased traffic.
Impact on schools, health care and police.

Object

Representation ID: 3737

Received: 14/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Gerwyn Jones

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.
Loss of arable land.
Impact on wildlife, ecology and habitat.
Loss of areas the rights of way.
Increase in flooding.
Increased traffic.
Strain on local services.
Impact on already strained doctors and dentists.
Objects to building on the green belt.

Object

Representation ID: 3738

Received: 17/11/2021

Respondent: Ms Carla Francis

Linthouse Lane

Congestion on roads
Over crowded schools
Loss of green space
Pollution
An eye sore
Crime
Pressure on new cross hospital
Should be on brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 3740

Received: 06/12/2021

Respondent: J Francis

Linthouse Lane.

Spurious housing need targets.
South Staffs get the council tax but Wolverhampton bears the burdon.
Schools, doctors and local services are stretched.
Lungs of Wolverhampton.
Green spaces essential to wellbeing.
Boris Johnson pushing brownfield agenda.
Will affect future generations.

Object

Representation ID: 3741

Received: 17/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Robert Francis

Linthouse Lane.

Loss of wildlife.
Site prone to flooding.

Object

Representation ID: 3742

Received: 17/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Martin Fryer

Linthouse Lane.

Use land for walking regularly.
Beautiful area and crime to be built on.
Should be regenerating Wolverhampton and brownfield land.
Loss of habitat and wildlife, need to look after nature.
Risk of urban sprawl.

Object

Representation ID: 3743

Received: 28/11/2021

Respondent: Mr A Gainey

Linthouse Lane.

Traffic already a problem and development will make it worse.
Plans not been adapted since covid.
Green space essential for mental wellbeing.
Site used for walking and exercising.
Over 5000 residents objected since proposed in 2019.
Strain on health care.
Area prone to flooding.
Should build on brownfield land, especially following decline of centres from COVID.

Object

Representation ID: 3744

Received: 29/11/2021

Respondent: J Gainey

Linthouse Lane.

Traffic already a problem and will be made much worse by development.
Plans received over 5000 objections since 2019.
Green space essential for health and wellbeing.
Healthcare overstretched.
Area used for walking and recreation.
Area prone to flooding.
Should be building on brownfield, e.g. empty shops in Wolverhampton following COVID.

Object

Representation ID: 3767

Received: 23/11/2021

Respondent: Carol Hyatt

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.
Objects to developing green belt.
Loss of arable land.
Impact on Infrastructure.
Impact on wildlife.
PO does not address Net Zero targets.

Object

Representation ID: 3808

Received: 06/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Stephen Hill

Sites in Wombourne, Swindon, Trysull and Kinver.

Loss of village character.
Increase in traffic, congestion and pollution.
Negative effect on mental health.
Damage cannot be reversed.

Object

Representation ID: 3848

Received: 06/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs D Hodgkiss

Site 582

Purchased house for the view.
Access to greenspace essential for mental health.
Loss of wildlife.
Doctors oversubscribed.
More cars, traffic and pollution.

Object

Representation ID: 3850

Received: 11/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs Linda Hitchens

Linthouse Lane.

Goes against national campaign to plant trees against climate change.
Destruction of trees, hedgerows and grassland.
Greenbelt used for recreation, for physical and mental health.
Nearby electricity pylons may interfere with development.
Wood End Road has heavy traffic and struggle to get out of drive as it is.
Shortage of GPs and appointments local already.
Most importantly, should be building on brownfield sites to save greenbelt and regenerate area.

Object

Representation ID: 3878

Received: 14/12/2021

Respondent: Save the Seven Cornfields Campaign Group

There is no consideration to try to avoid land banking and local land being monopolised by a few developers – this drives land prices upward.
Overspill housing will encourage commuting and unsustainable development and create more pollution (including reduces air quality).
Object to development at Linthorne Road, Langley Road and Cross Green.
Flooding – evidence to show ample flooding at nearby sites, if there is poor planning Linthorne Road, Langley Road and Cross Green could be subjected to flooding.
Development may bring water tables upward sin other local areas.
The mix of housing should be in favour of affordable social housing – this cannot be guaranteed.
Increased traffic, congestion and pollution. Increase in hazards and dangers to do with road safety, increase accidents.
Access point to the new site will become pinch points.
Roads are currently already at capacity.
Strain on infrastructure.
Increased pressure on Russells Hall Hospital and New Cross Wolverhampton hospital.
Impact on local schools, increase in class sizes – increase in poor education attainment.
Increased strain on GP surgeries and dentists- longer wait times.
Loss of spare service capacity eg waste disposal.
Proposed development is out of scale and not in keeping with the character of the area.
Increase of noise pollution and loss of privacy.
Creating urban sprawl.
Lack of public transport both bus and rail.
Loss of green open recreational spaces – can effect mental health.
Lack of free green space availability will have effects on lower income households.
Detrimental to the character of the area.
Loss of countryside views.
Impact on wildlife, ecosystems and habitats. Loss of wildlife corridors.
Brownfield sites should be considered and utilised before green belt – vacant retail, office and industrial properties should be considered.
Increase in air pollution and associated health risks.