Question 9
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 599
Received: 12/12/2021
Respondent: Mr G Jordan
No if it means building on green belt land.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 711
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Penk Valley Academy Trust
No further comment
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 752
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Mrs R Groom
I am not familiar with these pitch allocations
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 839
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Staffordshire Wildlife Trust
Please see comments for Q8- more ecology evidence is needed to check sites are appropriate.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 842
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Mr Richard Williams
G18 Inappropriate
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 883
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Cannock Chase Council
We support your approach of meeting your needs within your administrative boundary and acknowledge this will require the use of land within the Green Belt. Advise that there is no capacity to assist in meeting your needs
within Cannock Chase District
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 906
Received: 28/01/2022
Respondent: Cheslyn Hay Parish Council
Would prefer not to continually extend existing pitches and a fairer distribution should be made across all 27 Parishes.
GT17 has been allocated 3 additional pitches.
GT35 (Rear of 122 Streets Lane) - greater enforcement of illegal activity should be provided by South Staffordshire Council and retrospective planning permissions should not be awarded so as to provide a deterant for retrospective applications.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 921
Received: 22/12/2021
Respondent: Natural England
Sites within 15km of Cannock Chase SAC will have potential recreational impacts.
Potential air quality impacts on designated sites - traffic assessment required.
GT32 - Hydroligically connection to Stowe Pool & Walk Mill Clay Pits SSSI.
GT35 - Likely Hydrologically connection to Stowe Pool & Walk Mill Clay Pits SSSI.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 958
Received: 01/02/2022
Respondent: Highways England
Early consultation will be required on sites to ensure appropriate assessments are carried out to identify the form of any mitigation required for the SRN and appropriate boundary treatments to SRN.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 963
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Gavin Williamson CBE MP
Deeply concerned about proposals to regularise unauthorised pitches to meet South Staffordshire’s Gypsy and Traveller needs. The council needs to keep pushing forwards with their Duty to Co-operate discussions with neighbouring local authorities to address some of the issues with meeting their Gypsy and Traveller needs. There have been many issues in the local area including travellers parking at the entrance to the field and not removing vehicles when requested, food being thrown into the field and the burning of plastic and tyres, also noise emanating from the site. Very concerned about the proposed site at 122 Streets Lane - there have been many issues in the local area including travellers parking at the entrance to the field and not removing vehicles when requested, food being thrown into the field and the burning of plastic and tyres, also noise emanating from the site. There is a very strong argument in making sure there is no further development of these sites.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 970
Received: 01/02/2022
Respondent: Ministry of Defence
Proposed pitches at New Acres Stables, Penkridge fall in safeguarding zone where any development 91.4m above ground level would require consultation.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1245
Received: 15/02/2022
Respondent: Historic England
GT01,05,06,08,18,23,32,33 - all sites scored green in HESA 2019 yet mitigation measures were identified.
GT07,14,17,34,35 - additional info to understand impacts & mitigation measures.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1325
Received: 09/12/2021
Respondent: M Baggott
Site Ref GT35 - 122 Street Lane, Cheslyn Hay.
Concerns about this site and information provided about it.
Also concerns of property values if this site was to be included.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1949
Received: 29/03/2022
Respondent: Canal & River Trust
GT08 - Mitigate visual impact on canal Conservation Area. Foul and Surface water need to be located away from the canal infrastructure.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1970
Received: 01/04/2022
Respondent: Penkridge Parish Council
Site GT01 is a temporary permitted site and should revert to Green Belt.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1976
Received: 02/11/2021
Respondent: Mr Mike Woodall
Disagree that current temporary sites should be given permanent status.
Will encourage future incursions on the green belt.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 2080
Received: 23/11/2021
Respondent: J Williams
Objects to Site in Streets Lane.
Animals are let loose.
Little social cohesion.
Suggests moving site to Codsall.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 2143
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Mr Peter Bennett
Wombourne Village is surrounded with green land which separates the village from other areas and the main road such as A449. This allows for spaced out housing, building on Poolhouse Roads and Billy Buns Lane in particular will create Urban Sprawl and Wombourne will no longer be defined as a Village.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 2144
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Mr Peter Bennett
Concerns into increased incidences of flooding with building on Pool House Road as the green land supplies as a natural drainage system allowing natural protection against flooding.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 2202
Received: 18/11/2021
Respondent: Mr G Wall
Object to site GT35.
Was only suppose to be a temporary site.
Burn rubbish at site and anti social behaviour (dogs barking).
Sewage system can't take more Caravans.
Negative impact on the environment.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 2232
Received: 07/12/2021
Respondent: T.V Woodfruff
Object to proposed GT35 site on Streets Lane.
Site currently has continual barking.
Site currently burn rubbish.
Lack of parking at site as the road is used which causes congestion and traffic.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 2374
Received: 12/12/2021
Respondent: Mr D Ridgway
Site GT35
In a residential area and will cause disturbances to surrounding community.
Business within site which does not fit in with surrounding residential area.
Numerous kennels in area which causes noise disturbance and dogs running into main road have nearly caused an accident in the past.
Pitches already on site cause problem for waste overflowing into the road.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 2468
Received: 16/12/2021
Respondent: Mr P Rogers
Against traveller site, potentially break rules.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 2978
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Mr C Stonehouse
Site GT01 is a temporary permitted site.
This site is on green belt.
Site has never formed part of existing community.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 3151
Received: 05/12/2021
Respondent: Mr Peter Drobac
4 caravan pitches at site reference G35
Burning toxic waste- environment issues
tipping rubbish
dog breeding- lots of barking day and night
Want to stop more pitches on this site
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 3479
Received: 23/11/2021
Respondent: Ms Linda Harrington
Travellers site Streets Lane, Cheslyn Hay.
Already has bad traffic in area.
Already struggle to get appointment with GP and dentist.
Continual barking coming from near by already.
I know places need to be found to accommodate the travellers, but they should not be set up on an already very busy road, it would be an accident just waiting to happen.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 3523
Received: 15/11/2021
Respondent: Fiona Heath
Lack of trust
They do not currently have permission for caravans but they are there anyway
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 3608
Received: 20/11/2021
Respondent: Miss N Kingston
Objects to proposed site GT 35.
Impact on policing, infrastructure and green belt.
The correct drainage infrastructure need to be implemented.
Car accidents - due to dogs running on roads.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 3651
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Mr V Kelly
Objects to site GT01.
Never formed part of the community.
Should revert to green belt.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 3860
Received: 15/11/2021
Respondent: Mrs Jillian Ward
Local amenities should be easily accessed from selected sites.