Question 12

Object

Representation ID: 2010

Received: 01/12/2021

Respondent: UKPI (Featherstone) Ltd

Agent: First City Limited

Policies DS1/ DS4 and SA1/SA7 represent policies which are necessary to address the strategic priorities of the area providing a stating point for any non- strategic policies there are needed as defined by NPPF.

SA1/SA4 policies should be included as strategic policies should be included as strategic policies as they are fairly detailed policies which paragraph 21 states this should not include as that should be left other non- strategic policies.

Support

Representation ID: 2092

Received: 12/04/2022

Respondent: St Mary Parish and The Archdiocese of Birmingham

Agent: First City Limited

Agree policies Ds1 and DS4 should be strategic policies.

Support

Representation ID: 2335

Received: 11/12/2021

Respondent: Dr R Painter

12a:
Agrees with polices outlined in chapter 6.

12b:
Agrees with policy requiring climate change driven initiatives.

Object

Representation ID: 2519

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Ms Shellee Phipps

Not clear what the implications of making a policy strategic w.r.t p21 are. As I don’t agree with SA5, I don’t think it should be written into any policy.

Object

Representation ID: 2953

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Mr C Stonehouse

The Local Plan is short term, seeks to bring forward previous sites proposed years ago.
Penkridge should have it's own development or Neighbourhood plan.
All strategic policies should be re-examined.
Piecemeal approach (short-term) with no regard to improve current infrastructure, services and employment.
the A449 is now 'de-trunked' - change the main travel corridor.
Cycle footpath from Gaily to Dunston has disappeared - needs renovating.

Object

Representation ID: 3103

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Mr John Marsh

12a) No

Sections taken form the NPPF:
Section 137 a) is breached- no details have been made public of what brownfield sites have been considered
Section 137 c) is breached- no details have been made public of any statement of common ground
Section 138) breached Wombourne not well serviced by public transport
Section 143) special circumstances have not been identified.
Section 144) nothing in the proposal outweighs damage to the green belt.
Section 145 and 146) none of the subsections are made out, the proposals are solely for housing and none of the exceptions in section 145 and 146 apply.

Object

Representation ID: 3122

Received: 11/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Roy Carrier

Suggest use of old "Spar" building for social housing

Object

Representation ID: 3559

Received: 12/07/2022

Respondent: Suan Lawson

It’s not clear what the implications of making a policy strategic w.r.t p21 are. As I don’t agree with SA5, I don’t think it should be written into any policy.

Object

Representation ID: 3654

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Mr V Kelly

Penkridge should have its won Neighbourhood Plan.
All strategic policies should be re-examined.
Should be a more sustainable approach to the growth of Penkridge.
Current planning is 'piece meal' and short term with no regard to improving infrastructure/services.
The proposal for a footpath/cycleway from Gailey to Dunston has disappeared - needs renovation.

Object

Representation ID: 3880

Received: 14/12/2021

Respondent: Save the Seven Cornfields Campaign Group

Infrastructure based policy had failed – not though of local residents needs.
Sectors that have been assumed to have been forecast growth through modelling are actually in decline due to COVID and Brexit being just two examples of causes.
Th plan is more about income and wealth rather than planning and Housing consideration.
Homelessness is not given appropriate consideration in PO.
Plan simply considered land for housing and not how to service sub-regions and neighbouring areas to enrich the area.
Lack of correspondence between Development Control and Development Planning.
PO does not address the inequalities found between those with lower incomes compared to those with larger incomes.
Planning committee is out of though with the younger generation that they are trying to attract to the area. PO does not address the type of facilities that are needed by the younger generation. This is reflected in the lack of public transport, and lack of varying income generating opportunities available.

Support

Representation ID: 3906

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Tarmac

Tarmac is broadly supportive of the strategies in question 12 and would be supportive of an individual employment allocation of the Hilton Mains Industrial Estate for B2, B8 and Sui Generis to ensure that due consideration is given to the site for possible employment opportunities and business needs.

Object

Representation ID: 3945

Received: 25/11/2021

Respondent: Brewood Civic Society

Q12 b)
No
No comment.

Object

Representation ID: 3946

Received: 12/04/2022

Respondent: St Mary Parish and The Archdiocese of Birmingham

Agent: First City Limited

we do not consider policies SA1-SA4 should be included as strategic policies as they are fairly detailed policies which paragraph 21 states this should not include as that should be left to other non-strategic policies.

Object

Representation ID: 3947

Received: 10/12/2021

Respondent: Wollaston Properties Ltd

Agent: First City Limited

Do not consider policies SA1-SA4 should be included as strategic policies as they are fairly detailed policies which paragraph 21 of the NPPF states this should not include as that should be left to other non-strategic policies.

Support

Representation ID: 3982

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Save the Lower Penn Green Belt (Action Group)

Yes, but the obvious omission is a strategic policy to limit the impact of development on Climate Change, including its location and its impact on development in more sustainable locations.

Object

Representation ID: 3983

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Save the Lower Penn Green Belt (Action Group)

With regards to South Staffordshire’s climate change emergency, housing development should be focused where there is the minimal requirement for private transport, close to schools, close to public amenities and close to employment opportunities. Housing shouldn’t be built that will encourage residents to move out from the centre of the urban conurbation and then commute
back into the conurbation for work as would be the case for Site 582.

New housing should be built on brownfield sites, in urban centres and close to public transport
and amenities.

Green field sites should be protected as part of the South Staffordshire Climate Change Emergency and these sites encouraged to develop their biodiversity.