Question 12

Object

Representation ID: 845

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Staffordshire Wildlife Trust

We feel that NB1 and 2 should be strategic policies. The NPPF advocates that plans should have ‘a strategic approach to maintaining and enhancing networks of habitats and green infrastructure; and plan for the enhancement of natural capital at a catchment or landscape scale across local authority boundaries.’

Object

Representation ID: 848

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Richard Williams

No

Object

Representation ID: 941

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Essington Parish Council

Agree with the strategic policies identified, but the obvious omission is a strategic policy to limit the impact of development on Climate Change, including its location and its impact on development in more sustainable locations.

Support

Representation ID: 966

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Gavin Williamson CBE MP

Agree with the identified strategic policies.

Support

Representation ID: 1076

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: St Philips

Agent: Pegasus Group

No objection - policies are strategic in their nature.

Object

Representation ID: 1123

Received: 11/02/2022

Respondent: Lower Penn Parish Council

Agree that policies are strategic, but another strategic policy is required to limit the impact of development of Climate Change, including its location and impact on development in more sustainable locations

Support

Representation ID: 1145

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd

Agent: Evolve Planning & Design

Agree that the policies outlined are strategic. Requires final drafted policy wording to determine whether other policies are strategic.

Support

Representation ID: 1159

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Lovell Homes

Agent: Evolve Planning & Design

Agree that the policies outlined are strategic. Requires final drafted policy wording to determine whether other policies are strategic.

Support

Representation ID: 1181

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Keon Homes

Agent: Evolve Planning & Design

Agree that the policies outlined are strategic. Requires final drafted policy wording to determine whether other policies are strategic.

Support

Representation ID: 1240

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Cameron Homes Ltd

Agent: Evolve Planning & Design

Agree that the policies outlined are strategic. Requires final drafted policy wording to determine whether other policies are strategic.

Support

Representation ID: 1266

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Bloor Homes

Agent: Evolve Planning & Design

Agree that the policies outlined are strategic. Requires final drafted policy wording to determine whether other policies are strategic.

Object

Representation ID: 1275

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: Deborah Aulton

When planning developments, properties should be designed to help disabled people and many changes can be made at early stages of developments which could later save costs adapting properties.

Organisations should consult with an actual disabled person when planning developments with a title “disability suitable”.

All it takes is a little extra thought outside the box, if I can offer any help on advising how to make disabled access and suitability better going forward, please contact.

Object

Representation ID: 1324

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Mr - Lacon

Agent: Mr William Dale

It is not agreed that these are the only strategic policies required by paragraph 21 of the NPPF. These are for the
reasons set out above regarding cross-boundary issues and housing need. It is proposed that additional land
should be allocated at Perton, owing to the sustainability credentials identified in the Local Plan evidence base.

Object

Representation ID: 1447

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Barratt West Midlands

Agent: Savills

Consider that the policies within each of these tables should be supported by an overarching strategic policy (NPPF paragraph 21).

Object

Representation ID: 1472

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Barratt West Midlands

Agent: Savills

Consider that the policies within each of these tables should be supported by an overarching strategic policy (NPPF paragraph 21).

Object

Representation ID: 1572

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Nigel Babb

a. It’s not clear what the implications of making a policy strategic w.r.t p21 are. As I don’t agree with SA5, I don’t think it should be written into any policy.
b.I don’t know what the legal implications of making something a strategic policy are, and this document doesn’t enlighten me. I’m happy for the Council to implement the policies that I have indicated I am happy with.

Support

Representation ID: 1584

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Bellway Homes Limited (Hyde Lane site)

Agent: Turley

Policies DS1 – DS4 and SA1 – SA7 represent policies which are limited to those necessary to address the strategic priorities of the area, providing a starting point for any non-strategic policies that are needed as defined by NPPF paragraph 21.

Support

Representation ID: 1612

Received: 06/01/2022

Respondent: Four Ashes Road LTD

Agent: Miss Rebecca Allen

FAR Ltd do not consider there to be any other proposed policies in Chapter 6 which should be identified as strategic policies.

FAR Ltd agree that the proposed fully drafted policies DS1-DS4 and SA1-SA7 are all strategic policies required by Paragraph 21 of the NPPF.

Object

Representation ID: 1644

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Bradford Estates

Agent: Berrys

Policies SA1 - SA7 all provide a level of detail that is more appropriately dealt with through non-strategic policies.

Support

Representation ID: 1752

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: St Philips Land Ltd

Agent: Lichfields

(a)
Yes. St Philips agrees with the Council that the draft Policies set out in Policies DS1-DS4 and SA1-SA7 are strategic policies as defined by paragraph 21 of the NPPF.

(b)
No. St Philips do not consider that any of the draft policies set out in Chapter 6 should be identified as Strategic Policies.

Support

Representation ID: 1768

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: St Philips Land Ltd

Agent: Lichfields

(a)
Yes. St Philips agrees with the Council that the draft Policies set out in Policies DS1-DS4 and SA1-SA7 are strategic policies as defined by paragraph 21 of the NPPF.

(b)
St Philips do not consider that any of the draft policies set out in Chapter 6 should be identified as Strategic Policies.

Support

Representation ID: 1778

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: St Philips

Agree that policies DS1-4 and SA1-7 are strategic policies. Do not consider any of the draft policies in Chapter 6 are strategic policies.

Object

Representation ID: 1787

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: John Davies Farms ltd.

Agent: Berrys

Policies SA1 - SA7 all provide a level of detail that is more appropriately dealt with through non-strategic policies.

Support

Representation ID: 1836

Received: 10/12/2021

Respondent: Wollaston Properties Ltd

Agent: First City Limited

In agreement of policies DS1-DS4 should be strategic policies. despite any comments
we made about the detail of the policies above.

Support

Representation ID: 1860

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: St Philips

Agent: Lichfields

(a)
Yes. St Philips agrees with the Council that the draft Policies set out in Policies DS1-DS4 and SA1-SA7 are strategic policies as defined by paragraph 21 of the NPPF.
(b)
No. St Philips do not consider that any of the draft policies set out in Chapter 6 should be identified as Strategic Policies.

Support

Representation ID: 1918

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey

Agent: Lichfields

(a)
Taylor Wimpey agrees with the Council that the draft Policies set out in Policies DS1-DS4 and SA1-SA7 are strategic policies as defined by paragraph 21 of the NPPF.
(b)
Taylor Wimpey do not consider that any of the draft policies set out in Chapter 6 should be identified as Strategic Policies.

Object

Representation ID: 1973

Received: 01/04/2022

Respondent: Penkridge Parish Council

Penkridge should be treated as an exception and have its own Development Plan/Neighbourhood Plan.
Current approach is piecemeal with no regard to improving infrastructure, services and employment.
Opportunity exists for growth to west of Penkridge and reclamation of centre of Penkridge from influence of A449.
Renovate footway/cycleway between Gailey and Dunston.

Object

Representation ID: 1991

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Terra Strategic

Agent: Terra Strategic

Terra agree that the policies as drafted constitute strategic policies. The NPPF requires the Council
to set out their overall strategy for the district during the Local Plan period, and these policies appropriately address the pattern, scale, and quality of development pursuant to Paragraph 20 of the NPPF. However, Terra feel that the Council could go further to improve the sustainability of existing villages within the District. The Council have proposed large areas of Green Belt release, whilst there remain settlements outside of the Green Belt, like Acton Trussell, which will not receive any growth.
In order to satisfy the requirements of Paragraph 141 of the NPPF, the Council need to explore all options for development before proposing Green Belt release. Therefore, the Council should be considering sites such as Land at Penkridge Road for development.

Support

Representation ID: 1999

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: UKPI (Featherstone) Ltd

Agent: First City Limited

Agreement with policies DS1 and DS4 which should be strategic policies.

Object

Representation ID: 2000

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: UKPI (Featherstone) Ltd

Agent: First City Limited

We do not consider policies SA1 and SA4 to be included as a strategic policy as they are fairly detailed policy which paragraph 21 stats this should not include as that should be left to other non-strategic policies.