Question 2
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1147
Received: 12/12/2021
Respondent: Lovell Homes
Agent: Evolve Planning & Design
The IDP identifies the correct infrastructure projects to support the proposed spatial strategy and may be updated to include site specific infrastructure requirements. Lovell Homes would welcome further discussions with the Parish Council, District Council and service providers to inform future iterations of the IDP.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1163
Received: 12/12/2021
Respondent: Keon Homes
Agent: Evolve Planning & Design
The IDP identifies the correct infrastructure projects to support the proposed spatial strategy and may be updated to include site specific infrastructure requirements.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1199
Received: 10/12/2021
Respondent: Mr - Cox & Jenks
Agent: PlanIt
The infrastructure requirements which are included within the IDP appear to be reasonable based upon the level of housing and employment growth which is currently
planned. However, should the Council accept the need for additional development over and above the Plan’s current allocations, the infrastructure requirements may
change.
The proposed housing allocations at Codsall will
provide an appropriate level of affordable housing, open space, education, health, sports and recreation, energy efficiency, climate change mitigation, biodiversity enhancement, flood risk mitigation, highways, sustainable transport, housing mix and green infrastructure. We can confirm that the landowners of Site 419 A&B will
continue to work with the Council to ensure that appropriate levels of infrastructure will be delivered in line with the relevant development plan policy standards.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1232
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Cameron Homes Ltd
Agent: Evolve Planning & Design
The IDP identifies the correct infrastructure projects to support the proposed spatial strategy and may be updated to include site specific infrastructure requirements. Land at Saredon Road and Landywood Lane can deliver the policy requirements set out in the Local Plan Review.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1258
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Bloor Homes
Agent: Evolve Planning & Design
The IDP identifies the correct infrastructure projects to support the proposed spatial strategy and may be updated to include site specific infrastructure requirements.
Land East of Bilbrook is a larger strategic proposal that can facilitate delivery of a 2FE First School, additional retail opportunities, green infrastructure enhancements, a new link road, improvements to Pendeford Mill Lane and pedestrian and cycling infrastructure.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1285
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Goldfinch TPS
Agent: Goldfinch TPS
IDP expressed as not comprehensive enough and informed by out of date date, to consider the proposed planning policy approach. There are questions raised towards reasonable prospects of the deliverability of some projects within the IDP.
Goldfinch TPS expresses the evidence base being informed by out of date data therefore questions the delivery and proposed policy approach being taken. Overall does not conform with NPPF and recommends to publish a 'deliverability test' for testing soundness of IDP.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1304
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Taylor Wimpy
Agent: Pegasus Group
Support
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1353
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Jay Farm Homes and Lawnswood Homes
Agent: SLR Consulting Ltd
2a - YES – The correct infrastructure and mechanisms to ensure it is delivered has been identified within the IDP.
2b - NO – There is no other elements of infrastructure which need to be considered at this stage given that it will be based on the individual site allocations and their associated constraints and opportunities.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1365
Received: 20/12/2021
Respondent: Richborough Estates
Agent: Pegasus Group
Support the infrastructure-led strategy’s focus of development on larger settlements with smaller sites in smaller settlements to deliver infrastructure benefits. Land west of Fenton House Lane could contribute to improvements to sports and leisure facilities, green infrastructure enhancements and health contributions.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1376
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd
Agent: Pegasus Group
Supports proposed infrastructure-led strategy which
seeks to focus development towards larger and better-connected settlements and, where appropriate, deliver new infrastructure benefits. The correct infrastructure to be delivered alongside proposed site allocations been been identified in the IDP.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1409
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: CWC Group - Clowes Developments
Agent: Savills
2b - Reference is made on page 12 of the IDP to the need for the Council to set out Green Belt loss compensatory measures including improvements to the environmental quality and accessibility of remaining Green Belt land. To provide certainty to developers the scope of requirements for compensatory enhancements should be set out clearly in the Infrastructure Delivery Plan and viability
appraisal.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1424
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Richborough Estates
Agent: Pegasus Group
Support the infrastructure-led strategy’s focus of development on larger settlements with smaller sites in smaller settlements to deliver infrastructure benefits. Land North of the A5 Gailey could deliver an employment-led development benefiting from infrastructure delivered through West Midlands Interchange and provide enhanced green infrastructure.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1438
Received: 10/12/2021
Respondent: Amadis Holdings Ltd
Agent: PlanIt
The infrastructure requirements included within the IDP are based upon the Preferred Options Plan’s housing and employment development targets. It is our view that the emerging Plan makes insufficient provision for housing development. Therefore, the IDP plans for an insufficient level of development. The IDP will need updating in due course if, as we suggest, the housing and employment requirements are increased upwards.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1440
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Richborough Estates
Agent: Pegasus Group
Support the infrastructure-led strategy’s focus of development on larger settlements with smaller sites in smaller settlements to deliver infrastructure benefits. Land at Boscomoor Lane, Penkridge could contribute to improvements to sports and leisure facilities, green infrastructure enhancements and health contributions.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1494
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: D Morgan PLC
Agent: Peacock and Smith
a) No.
b) Yes.
The Chase Line is a major asset to the District in terms of accessibility to surrounding settlements, towns and cities, including the GBHMA however the emerging Local Plan does not emphasise its presence. The baseline position is significantly outdated and results in an unsound and flawed assessment.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1522
Received: 10/12/2021
Respondent: Mr - Yeomans & Messrs Law
Agent: PlanIt
The infrastructure requirements included within the IDP are based upon the Preferred Options Plan’s housing and employment development targets. As detailed in these
Representations it is our view that the emerging Plan makes insufficient provision for housing development. That being the case, the IDP plans for an insufficient level of development. The IDP will need updating in due course if, as we suggest, the housing and employment requirements are increased.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1553
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Bellway Homes Limited (Hyde Lane site)
Agent: Turley
We have no objection to the potential junction improvements at White Hill / Meddins Lane and Meddins
Lane / Enville Road, indeed the need for these improvements were first identified as part of the adopted Site Allocation Plan. Land at Hyde Lane (west) could make a proportionate contribution to these off-site highway improvements.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1563
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Mr Nigel Babb
local doctors have complained that there is no room of expansion in the surgery, regardless what the CCG is saying.
The road system in Wombourne is number of suburban roads that act as through routes.
There is insufficient parking in Wombourne centre.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1573
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Bellway Homes Limited (Hyde Lane site)
Agent: Turley
Bellway's proposals for land at Hyde Lane (576) includes the potential to provide land for a new doctor’s surgery to serve Kinver.
Raised some concerns regarding the impact of the access road to ROF Featherstone and the associate costs on the viability and the potential delivery trajectory for the proposed Cross Green allocation (draft policy SA2). The IDP now estimates the cost of delivering this access road at £20m, to be funded via public sector funding and developer contributions. There remains a circa £18.5m gap. It is unlikely that development of the scale proposed at Cross Green (a minimum of 1,200 new homes) would viably be able to meet this gap in funding, particularly given the other significant infrastructure requirements of that site. The access road could potentially compromise when this proposed allocation starts delivering new homes unless the necessary funding is sourced.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1604
Received: 06/01/2022
Respondent: Four Ashes Road LTD
Agent: Miss Rebecca Allen
FAR Ltd supports the infrastructure projects to be delivered in relation to the proposed site allocations has been identified correctly in the IDP. FAR Ltd considers that there are no further infrastructure options that need to be considered.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1636
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Richborough Estates
Agent: Pegasus Group
Support the infrastructure-led strategy’s focus of development on larger settlements with smaller sites in smaller settlements to deliver infrastructure benefits. Land off Codsall Road, Wolverhampton (Palmers Cross) could contribute to improvements to sports and leisure facilities, green infrastructure enhancements and health contributions.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1647
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Richborough Estates
Agent: Pegasus Group
Support the infrastructure-led strategy’s focus of development on larger settlements with smaller sites in smaller settlements to deliver infrastructure benefits. Land off Langley Road could improve sports and leisure facilities, develop new primary education facilities, enhance the Green Infrastructure Network and provide health contributions.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1675
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Mr J Barnes
Site 582 Langley Road - No robust assessment which tests whether infrastructure could actually support a development. Lack of transport network is a huge issue. No assessment of how many people might realistically use each type of transport depending on the demographic of housing which is intended on the new site.
People would be relocating from 20 miles away where the shortage is – to commute back to their areas of existing employment or to areas for employment growth in our district which are nowhere near site 582.
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1684
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Mrs Vicky Barnes
Site 582 Langley Road - No robust assessment which tests whether infrastructure could actually support a development. Lack of transport network is a huge issue. No assessment of how many people might realistically use each type of transport depending on the demographic of housing which is intended on the new site.
People would be relocating from 20 miles away where the shortage is – to commute back to their areas of existing employment or to areas for employment growth in our district which are nowhere near site 582.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1694
Received: 14/03/2022
Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd
Agent: Pegasus Group
Supports proposed infrastructure-led strategy which seeks to focus development towards larger and better-connected settlements and, where appropriate, deliver new infrastructure benefits. The correct infrastructure to be delivered alongside proposed site allocations been been identified in the IDP.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1708
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Richborough Estates
Agent: Pegasus Group
Support the infrastructure-led strategy’s focus of development on larger settlements with smaller sites in smaller settlements to deliver infrastructure benefits. Land off New Road, Featherstone could contribute to improvements to sports and leisure facilities, green infrastructure enhancements and health contributions.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1720
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Richborough Estates
Agent: Pegasus Group
Support the infrastructure-led strategy’s focus of development on larger settlements with smaller sites in smaller settlements to deliver infrastructure benefits. Land off Station Road could provide a 30 space car park, improve sports and leisure facilities, develop new primary education facilities, enhance the Green Infrastructure Network and provide health contributions.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1739
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: Richborough Estates
Agent: Pegasus Group
Support the infrastructure-led strategy’s focus of development on larger settlements with smaller sites in smaller settlements to deliver infrastructure benefits. Land off Strawmoor Lane could contribute to improvements to sports and leisure facilities, green infrastructure enhancements and health contributions.
Support
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1754
Received: 13/12/2021
Respondent: St Philips Land Ltd
Agent: Lichfields
St Philips agree that the Council has set out the correct and appropriate infrastructure. However, several infrastructure improvements or new provisions required for Penkridge, several remain un-costed. In particular, no costs associated with the new education provision or country park
Object
Preferred Options November 2021
Representation ID: 1803
Received: 06/12/2021
Respondent: Persimmon Homes
Agent: RPS Group
The IDP should be amended to reflect the presence of a health centre in Featherstone and the potential opportunities to maximise the future viability of this infrastructure. Emerging infrastructure opportunities should be considered alongside existing ones in the Featherstone area. There is significant uncertainty about the delivery of the Cross Green road link, park and ride and primary school, making it difficult to determine if this allocation is deliverable. In light of this uncertainty, greater consideration should be given to additional allocations to act as contingency sites should strategic allocations not come forward as expected.