Question 2

Showing comments and forms 91 to 120 of 144

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1147

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Lovell Homes

Agent: Evolve Planning & Design

Representation Summary:

The IDP identifies the correct infrastructure projects to support the proposed spatial strategy and may be updated to include site specific infrastructure requirements. Lovell Homes would welcome further discussions with the Parish Council, District Council and service providers to inform future iterations of the IDP.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1163

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Keon Homes

Agent: Evolve Planning & Design

Representation Summary:

The IDP identifies the correct infrastructure projects to support the proposed spatial strategy and may be updated to include site specific infrastructure requirements.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1199

Received: 10/12/2021

Respondent: Mr - Cox & Jenks

Agent: PlanIt

Representation Summary:

The infrastructure requirements which are included within the IDP appear to be reasonable based upon the level of housing and employment growth which is currently
planned. However, should the Council accept the need for additional development over and above the Plan’s current allocations, the infrastructure requirements may
change.
The proposed housing allocations at Codsall will
provide an appropriate level of affordable housing, open space, education, health, sports and recreation, energy efficiency, climate change mitigation, biodiversity enhancement, flood risk mitigation, highways, sustainable transport, housing mix and green infrastructure. We can confirm that the landowners of Site 419 A&B will
continue to work with the Council to ensure that appropriate levels of infrastructure will be delivered in line with the relevant development plan policy standards.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1232

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Cameron Homes Ltd

Agent: Evolve Planning & Design

Representation Summary:

The IDP identifies the correct infrastructure projects to support the proposed spatial strategy and may be updated to include site specific infrastructure requirements. Land at Saredon Road and Landywood Lane can deliver the policy requirements set out in the Local Plan Review.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1258

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Bloor Homes

Agent: Evolve Planning & Design

Representation Summary:

The IDP identifies the correct infrastructure projects to support the proposed spatial strategy and may be updated to include site specific infrastructure requirements.

Land East of Bilbrook is a larger strategic proposal that can facilitate delivery of a 2FE First School, additional retail opportunities, green infrastructure enhancements, a new link road, improvements to Pendeford Mill Lane and pedestrian and cycling infrastructure.

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1285

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Goldfinch TPS

Agent: Goldfinch TPS

Representation Summary:

IDP expressed as not comprehensive enough and informed by out of date date, to consider the proposed planning policy approach. There are questions raised towards reasonable prospects of the deliverability of some projects within the IDP.

Goldfinch TPS expresses the evidence base being informed by out of date data therefore questions the delivery and proposed policy approach being taken. Overall does not conform with NPPF and recommends to publish a 'deliverability test' for testing soundness of IDP.

Attachments:

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1304

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Taylor Wimpy

Agent: Pegasus Group

Representation Summary:

Support

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1353

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Jay Farm Homes and Lawnswood Homes

Agent: SLR Consulting Ltd

Representation Summary:

2a - YES – The correct infrastructure and mechanisms to ensure it is delivered has been identified within the IDP.

2b - NO – There is no other elements of infrastructure which need to be considered at this stage given that it will be based on the individual site allocations and their associated constraints and opportunities.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1365

Received: 20/12/2021

Respondent: Richborough Estates

Agent: Pegasus Group

Representation Summary:

Support the infrastructure-led strategy’s focus of development on larger settlements with smaller sites in smaller settlements to deliver infrastructure benefits. Land west of Fenton House Lane could contribute to improvements to sports and leisure facilities, green infrastructure enhancements and health contributions.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1376

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd

Agent: Pegasus Group

Representation Summary:

Supports proposed infrastructure-led strategy which
seeks to focus development towards larger and better-connected settlements and, where appropriate, deliver new infrastructure benefits. The correct infrastructure to be delivered alongside proposed site allocations been been identified in the IDP.

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1409

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: CWC Group - Clowes Developments

Agent: Savills

Representation Summary:

2b - Reference is made on page 12 of the IDP to the need for the Council to set out Green Belt loss compensatory measures including improvements to the environmental quality and accessibility of remaining Green Belt land. To provide certainty to developers the scope of requirements for compensatory enhancements should be set out clearly in the Infrastructure Delivery Plan and viability
appraisal.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1424

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Richborough Estates

Agent: Pegasus Group

Representation Summary:

Support the infrastructure-led strategy’s focus of development on larger settlements with smaller sites in smaller settlements to deliver infrastructure benefits. Land North of the A5 Gailey could deliver an employment-led development benefiting from infrastructure delivered through West Midlands Interchange and provide enhanced green infrastructure.

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1438

Received: 10/12/2021

Respondent: Amadis Holdings Ltd

Agent: PlanIt

Representation Summary:

The infrastructure requirements included within the IDP are based upon the Preferred Options Plan’s housing and employment development targets. It is our view that the emerging Plan makes insufficient provision for housing development. Therefore, the IDP plans for an insufficient level of development. The IDP will need updating in due course if, as we suggest, the housing and employment requirements are increased upwards.

Attachments:

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1440

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Richborough Estates

Agent: Pegasus Group

Representation Summary:

Support the infrastructure-led strategy’s focus of development on larger settlements with smaller sites in smaller settlements to deliver infrastructure benefits. Land at Boscomoor Lane, Penkridge could contribute to improvements to sports and leisure facilities, green infrastructure enhancements and health contributions.

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1494

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: D Morgan PLC

Agent: Peacock and Smith

Representation Summary:

a) No.
b) Yes.
The Chase Line is a major asset to the District in terms of accessibility to surrounding settlements, towns and cities, including the GBHMA however the emerging Local Plan does not emphasise its presence. The baseline position is significantly outdated and results in an unsound and flawed assessment.

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1522

Received: 10/12/2021

Respondent: Mr - Yeomans & Messrs Law

Agent: PlanIt

Representation Summary:

The infrastructure requirements included within the IDP are based upon the Preferred Options Plan’s housing and employment development targets. As detailed in these
Representations it is our view that the emerging Plan makes insufficient provision for housing development. That being the case, the IDP plans for an insufficient level of development. The IDP will need updating in due course if, as we suggest, the housing and employment requirements are increased.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1553

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Bellway Homes Limited (Hyde Lane site)

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

We have no objection to the potential junction improvements at White Hill / Meddins Lane and Meddins
Lane / Enville Road, indeed the need for these improvements were first identified as part of the adopted Site Allocation Plan. Land at Hyde Lane (west) could make a proportionate contribution to these off-site highway improvements.

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1563

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Nigel Babb

Representation Summary:

local doctors have complained that there is no room of expansion in the surgery, regardless what the CCG is saying.
The road system in Wombourne is number of suburban roads that act as through routes.
There is insufficient parking in Wombourne centre.

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1573

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Bellway Homes Limited (Hyde Lane site)

Agent: Turley

Representation Summary:

Bellway's proposals for land at Hyde Lane (576) includes the potential to provide land for a new doctor’s surgery to serve Kinver.

Raised some concerns regarding the impact of the access road to ROF Featherstone and the associate costs on the viability and the potential delivery trajectory for the proposed Cross Green allocation (draft policy SA2). The IDP now estimates the cost of delivering this access road at £20m, to be funded via public sector funding and developer contributions. There remains a circa £18.5m gap. It is unlikely that development of the scale proposed at Cross Green (a minimum of 1,200 new homes) would viably be able to meet this gap in funding, particularly given the other significant infrastructure requirements of that site. The access road could potentially compromise when this proposed allocation starts delivering new homes unless the necessary funding is sourced.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1604

Received: 06/01/2022

Respondent: Four Ashes Road LTD

Agent: Miss Rebecca Allen

Representation Summary:

FAR Ltd supports the infrastructure projects to be delivered in relation to the proposed site allocations has been identified correctly in the IDP. FAR Ltd considers that there are no further infrastructure options that need to be considered.

Attachments:

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1636

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Richborough Estates

Agent: Pegasus Group

Representation Summary:

Support the infrastructure-led strategy’s focus of development on larger settlements with smaller sites in smaller settlements to deliver infrastructure benefits. Land off Codsall Road, Wolverhampton (Palmers Cross) could contribute to improvements to sports and leisure facilities, green infrastructure enhancements and health contributions.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1647

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Richborough Estates

Agent: Pegasus Group

Representation Summary:

Support the infrastructure-led strategy’s focus of development on larger settlements with smaller sites in smaller settlements to deliver infrastructure benefits. Land off Langley Road could improve sports and leisure facilities, develop new primary education facilities, enhance the Green Infrastructure Network and provide health contributions.

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1675

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Mr J Barnes

Representation Summary:

Site 582 Langley Road - No robust assessment which tests whether infrastructure could actually support a development. Lack of transport network is a huge issue. No assessment of how many people might realistically use each type of transport depending on the demographic of housing which is intended on the new site.
People would be relocating from 20 miles away where the shortage is – to commute back to their areas of existing employment or to areas for employment growth in our district which are nowhere near site 582.

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1684

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs Vicky Barnes

Representation Summary:

Site 582 Langley Road - No robust assessment which tests whether infrastructure could actually support a development. Lack of transport network is a huge issue. No assessment of how many people might realistically use each type of transport depending on the demographic of housing which is intended on the new site.
People would be relocating from 20 miles away where the shortage is – to commute back to their areas of existing employment or to areas for employment growth in our district which are nowhere near site 582.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1694

Received: 14/03/2022

Respondent: Taylor Wimpey UK Ltd

Agent: Pegasus Group

Representation Summary:

Supports proposed infrastructure-led strategy which seeks to focus development towards larger and better-connected settlements and, where appropriate, deliver new infrastructure benefits. The correct infrastructure to be delivered alongside proposed site allocations been been identified in the IDP.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1708

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Richborough Estates

Agent: Pegasus Group

Representation Summary:

Support the infrastructure-led strategy’s focus of development on larger settlements with smaller sites in smaller settlements to deliver infrastructure benefits. Land off New Road, Featherstone could contribute to improvements to sports and leisure facilities, green infrastructure enhancements and health contributions.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1720

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Richborough Estates

Agent: Pegasus Group

Representation Summary:

Support the infrastructure-led strategy’s focus of development on larger settlements with smaller sites in smaller settlements to deliver infrastructure benefits. Land off Station Road could provide a 30 space car park, improve sports and leisure facilities, develop new primary education facilities, enhance the Green Infrastructure Network and provide health contributions.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1739

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Richborough Estates

Agent: Pegasus Group

Representation Summary:

Support the infrastructure-led strategy’s focus of development on larger settlements with smaller sites in smaller settlements to deliver infrastructure benefits. Land off Strawmoor Lane could contribute to improvements to sports and leisure facilities, green infrastructure enhancements and health contributions.

Support

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1754

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: St Philips Land Ltd

Agent: Lichfields

Representation Summary:

St Philips agree that the Council has set out the correct and appropriate infrastructure. However, several infrastructure improvements or new provisions required for Penkridge, several remain un-costed. In particular, no costs associated with the new education provision or country park

Object

Preferred Options November 2021

Representation ID: 1803

Received: 06/12/2021

Respondent: Persimmon Homes

Agent: RPS Group

Representation Summary:

The IDP should be amended to reflect the presence of a health centre in Featherstone and the potential opportunities to maximise the future viability of this infrastructure. Emerging infrastructure opportunities should be considered alongside existing ones in the Featherstone area. There is significant uncertainty about the delivery of the Cross Green road link, park and ride and primary school, making it difficult to determine if this allocation is deliverable. In light of this uncertainty, greater consideration should be given to additional allocations to act as contingency sites should strategic allocations not come forward as expected.