Question 7

Object

Representation ID: 2668

Received: 17/11/2021

Respondent: Mr James Trevor

Linthouse Lane

Green belt is much loved by residents.
Concerned local amenities will not cope with increased demand - schools and doctors over subscribed.
Should be building on brownfield locations.

Object

Representation ID: 2684

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Derek Tucker

Site 036c Weeping Cross

Local infrastructure cannot cope with current demands including schools, hospitals and emergency services.
Road network already full to capacity, increase will increase congestion and air pollution.
We should be building on brownfield land and not on greenbelt land.

Object

Representation ID: 2722

Received: 17/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Kyle Smith

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.

Highways issues: Increased pollution, increased congestion.
Impact on public services such a s GPs, Dentists and Public Transport.
Objects to building on the green belt.
Impact on wildlife and habitats.

Object

Representation ID: 2746

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Ms Rachael Villau

Linthouse Lane

Detrimental to physical and mental health of residents.
Killing wildlife and habitats.
Detrimental to climate change and should be protecting the planet.
Should be redeveloping brownfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 2776

Received: 11/12/2021

Respondent: Miss Helen Brown

Linthouse Lane

Linthouse Lane is prone to surface water flooding, which will be exacerbated by development and increase in impermeable surfaces.
This will change environment for the worse and be part of SSDC legacy.

Object

Representation ID: 2782

Received: 11/12/2021

Respondent: D Burden

Linthouse Lane

Should be developing brownfield sites instead.
Site used for residents for walking and recreation, important for their mental health.
Loss of good farmland.
Development will put pressure on stretched infrastructure.
Development will increase flooding due to climate change.

Object

Representation ID: 2783

Received: 11/12/2021

Respondent: S Burden

Linthouse lane.

Should build on brownfield sites first.
Homes would cripple already weak infrastructure.
New Cross Hospital already under severe pressure.
More cars on road will cause further traffic and accidents.
Site floods with heavy rain which will get worse with climate change.
Already sewerage and drainage problems which will be made worse.
Should be thinking about environment and climate change.
Loss of productive agricultural land.

Object

Representation ID: 2804

Received: 30/11/2021

Respondent: Mr G Cannon

Objects to Linthouse Lane
- Within the Greenbelt
-Harmful to the environment

Object

Representation ID: 2806

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: Ian Carter

Objects to Linthouse Lane
- Loss of green space
- Impact of Wildlife- Loss of habitats and animals.
- Brownfield sites should be used before greenfield

Object

Representation ID: 2855

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Ms Angela Spence

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3

Brownfields should be utilised, has the National Brownfield Institute been contacted?
Objects to building on the green belt.
Loss of green, recreational space.
Highways issues: Increase in pollution, increase in traffic.
Impact on local infrastructure.

Object

Representation ID: 2858

Received: 14/12/2021

Respondent: R Catchpole

Site 036c Wildwood

Infrastructure in area already under enormous pressure from new housing.
Doctors and schools oversubscribed.
Traffic and congestion already an issue, which will be exacerbated.
Will cause additional pollution.

Object

Representation ID: 2863

Received: 05/12/2021

Respondent: Ms Joyce Chapman

Linthouse Lane

Land floods and will be made worse by development.
Loss of greenbelt.
Schools and doctors already overstretched.
Will affect Wolverhampton Council and infrastructure, not South Staffordshire Council.
Unsuitable location and unfair on existing residents.

Object

Representation ID: 2864

Received: 20/11/2021

Respondent: Ms Jenny Charlton

Weeping Cross 036c

Previous application for site was withdrawn following objection and appeal.
Infrastructure cannot support development, A34 with heavy traffic and congestion.
Schools and doctors oversubscribed.
Another new development locally at old police headquarters.

Object

Representation ID: 2871

Received: 13/06/2022

Respondent: Mr Alan Jones

Objection to the proposed development on Farmland between Essington and Wednesfield: known as Prestwood Farm.

Essington does not have the capacity for the number of proposed homes and would not be able to manage the traffic control measures, volume and speed on both Linthouse Lane and Wood End Road.
Local services such as schools and medical services are over exacerbated and more residents will add to this.
There is lack of acknowledgment to the protection the environment and maintaining the green belt, there are threats of floods within the area and the land absorbs precipitation slowly therefore water is stored on land.
There are concerns into the lack of consideration for development which is placed onto Brownfield sites and empty property sites, rather than damaging agricultural land.

Object

Representation ID: 2879

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Roger Charman

Number of people: 2

Site 036c Wildwood.

Already heavy traffic and congestion on Cannock Road.
Roads in state of disrepair and unsuitable for traffic volume.
Hospitals, doctors and dentists are oversubscribed.

Object

Representation ID: 2889

Received: 07/11/2021

Respondent: Mr W Clarke

Linthouse Lane

Should be using brownfield land.
Contradicts environmental conservation.
Are all these houses really needed?
Area already suffers from traffic and congestion, will be made a lot worse.
Residents have a right to enjoy local area and green space too for walking and views, important for mental health.
Potential for large estate to become run down and attract crime.
Will impact house prices for local people.
Council will struggle to cope maintaining road and refuse collection.

Object

Representation ID: 2895

Received: 23/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs P Clifft

Linthouse Lane.

Already a problem with traffic and congestion, will me made worse by development.
Road subject to flooding.
Loss of good quality agricultural land.
Impact quality of life for local people.
Amenities including doctors and hospitals already overstretched.
Will affect current residents house prices.
Need to keep greenbelt for definition between West Midlands and South Staffordshire.

Object

Representation ID: 2896

Received: 02/11/2022

Respondent: Mr Derek Hodgkiss

Concerns with the new development across Linthouse lane which will damage the wildlife and nature of the green belt. There is a risk to lose the greenbelt which will cause much more flooding between Wolverhampton and South Staffordshire. Concerns into the extra traffic which will be caused as the boundary would be one road to Linthouse Lane.

Concerns into the lack of brownfield sites which are not considered into the local plan view which are used for development.

Object

Representation ID: 2920

Received: 19/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Mark Cockayne

Linthouse Lane

Should be built on brownfield sites.
Already a new development for 600 homes close by.
GPs, hospital and schools already overstretched.
Already high traffic volumes on Linthouse Lane.
Area subject to flooding, which will be made worse by development.
Footpath through site well used and loved by residents.
Conflict as on Wolverhampton boarder.

Object

Representation ID: 2927

Received: 23/11/2021

Respondent: Mr J Corey

Site 486c Linthouse Lane

Battle of Wodenfied took pace on the fields - heritage should be preserved.
Should be protecting environment in line with COP26.
Is there any compensation for residents of Wood End Road who's hoses back onto the site? As property prices will be affected.
Should be using brownfield sites in Birmingham and Wolverhampton.

Object

Representation ID: 2974

Received: 08/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Robert Mason

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3

Loss of good quality arable land.
Impact on wildlife and trees.
Increase in pollution.
Increased Flooding risk on Linthouse Land.

Object

Representation ID: 2976

Received: 17/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Paul McLoone

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.

Loss of green, recreational spaces.
Objects to building on the green belt.
Brownfield sites should be utilised first.

Object

Representation ID: 2979

Received: 18/11/2021

Respondent: Liam Cotterill

Objects to Linthouse Lane.
- Green Belt land
- Impact on wildlife- loss of habitat
- Impact on infrastructure- roads will not cope with increase
- Impact on GP surgeries and school- lack of capacity.
- Brownfield sites should be used before Green Belt.

Object

Representation ID: 2980

Received: 03/12/2021

Respondent: Alex Costello

Objects to Linthouse Lane
- Loss of Green Belt
- Brownfield sites should be considered before Green Belt
- Impact on infrastructure- roads will not cope with increased traffic
- Impact on local schools, GPs and health care services- do not have the capacity.
Environmental impact- loss of wildlife

Object

Representation ID: 2982

Received: 11/12/2021

Respondent: Miss Mandy Cook

Objects to Linthouse Lane
- Loss of historic shite
- Impact on Wildlife
- Impact on GPs, Schools and Health Care services- lack of capacity
- Environmemtal impact- pollution due to increased traffic.
- Loss of Green Belt

Object

Representation ID: 2983

Received: 17/11/2021

Respondent: Emma Cooke

Linthouse Lane
Object to huge residential housing development will alter the area and amenity.
Natural light, flora and will be being lost, and animals and birds will lose their natural habitat.
Brownfield sites should be developed first.

Support Essington Action Group's request for evidence regarding brownfield sites outside the West Midlands conurbation to be examined again.
Essington Action Group is correct in its submissions to the council that the preferred option - chosen by South Staffordshire District Council - has been written just for this land on the Wednesfield boundary, and not for any other area of the document.

Object

Representation ID: 2984

Received: 17/06/2022

Respondent: William and Gloria Compton

Linthouse Lane - Loss of greenbelt
Concerns on the effects it would have on the
surrounding area both logistically and environmentally.

Object

Representation ID: 3000

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Mr C Stonehouse

Sites 584 and 010 are incorrect.
Current development Plans of Bloors ad Cameron's Homes have not been included. Nor has the Anaerobic Digester.
Penk River flood plain is assumed to not be being used to offset/reduce the provision of local open spaces.

b) Yes.
Design of DP and NP required in North Penkridge - to minimise the use of A449.
Land should be designated for the western spine road if the west of Penkridge is feasible.
Consider the A449 use being changed to a safe pedestrian/cycle local route, and in the village centre narrow carriageways with safe crossings.
Safe pedestrian routes through green infrastructure.

Object

Representation ID: 3014

Received: 10/12/2021

Respondent: Andrea Morgan

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.
Loss of green recreation spaces.
Increase in noise disturbance and pollution.
Impact and loss of wildlife.

Object

Representation ID: 3015

Received: 19/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs A Moore

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.

Objects to building on green belt.
Loss of green recreational space.
Impact on wildlife.
Highway issues: Increase in traffic.
House prices will plummet in the area.
Loss of countryside views.
Proposed development site land is prone to flooding.