Question 7

Object

Representation ID: 3020

Received: 04/12/2021

Respondent: D Coxsell

Local roads are exceptionally busy and cannot cope with additional cars expected.
Local shops at Wood End, Ashmore Park and Stubb Lane have insufficient parking.
Linthouse Lane is susceptible to flooding, which will be made worse by development.
Brownfield land should be used and greenfield protected, in line with Government agenda and climate change prevention.
GPs already beyond capacity.
Developments attached to neighbouring LA burdening them.

Object

Representation ID: 3027

Received: 16/11/2021

Respondent: Miss Lucy Crook

Objection to development at Kitchen Lane and Linthouse Lane.
Loss of greenbelt and views.
Local schools and doctors and roads can't cope with the scale of development.
Building work will disrupt residents.

Object

Representation ID: 3028

Received: 06/12/2021

Respondent: Mr P Crook

Objection to development at Linthouse Lane.
Loss of views and devalue my property.
Current water pressure issues.
Local amenities such as Doctors can't cope.
Lack of policing and high level of crime.
Loss of green space for residents and wildlife

Object

Representation ID: 3035

Received: 20/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs Sarah Murphy

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.

Objects to building on Green belt.
Spoil local views.
Loss of green recreational spaces.
Impact local wildlife.
Increased pressure on schools and local amenities.
Impact on Doctors, dentists - already at capacity,
Flooding: reduce drainage for water, there has been flooding in the area in the past.

Object

Representation ID: 3036

Received: 16/11/2021

Respondent: Miss Katy Murmanis

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.

Loss of green, recreational spaces.
Objects to building on the green belt.

Object

Representation ID: 3052

Received: 18/11/2021

Respondent: Christopher Moore

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.

Already been considerable development in the area.
Object to building on the green belt.
Brownfield sites should be utilised first.
Highway issues: increased traffic.

Object

Representation ID: 3064

Received: 05/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Chris Dallaway

Linthouse Lane Site 486c.

Only bit of countryside in Wednesfield, should be maintained for local people.
Will spoil residents views, which is reason for choosing this property.
View important for mental health and loss is a horrible thought.
Loss of habitats and wildlife.
Area is a much beloved walking area for local people.
We need more rewilding and access to green space, not more buildings.

Object

Representation ID: 3070

Received: 23/06/2022

Respondent: Resident

Development should be intergrated into Penkridge.
Site can be seen from a number of view points across area.
Site located next to anaerobic digester.
Policy should require:
• The creation of high quality direct pedestrian and cycling routes from the development to the key facilities in the settlement
• Suitable bus stops and facilities
• The creation of a country park on both sides of the Penk south to Penkridge Middle School at least from the A449. The current proposal doesn't form any sort of contiguous facility and simply uses a piece of floodplain that can’t be developed. A part of 420 and 584 should be allocated for “green infrastructure”. This would be a practical contribution to reducing the need for residents to visit Cannock Chase.
• The creation of a new pedestrian route from the development across the floodplain to Penkridge Middle School as well as ongoing connections to Wolgartson High School to enable pupils to walk and cycle easily and safely to school
• The provision of additional pedestrian crossings on the A449 to ensure that it doesn’t become a barrier to sustainable movement
• Improvements to Penkridge railway station which may involve the provision of additional parking by the Monckton Centre. (the station car parks are normally full with additional parking on verges)
• Improvements to the centre of Penkridge to allow the facilities to better serve a greatly increased population and to improve it to form a “town centre”. (I am concerned that with the reference to retail in the new development we will end up with two retail complexes at either end of Penkridge which both generate vehicular trips and create completely separate communities. In addition you struggle to get a GP appointment now!)
• That the public open space is useable for the majority of the time.
• That wildlife corridors are maintained and created

Object

Representation ID: 3075

Received: 24/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Kevin Carruthers

Green belt needs to be put in place around this new development to separate from Dunston.
What shown on plans, needs to be delivered (not as with Persimmon Development)
Medical Services up to capacity - will not cope with more.
Investment needed in Canal tow paths/cycle paths to encourage cyclists (less cars)
Secure cycle storage at Station required to reduce car use.
Use of /investment in Littleton Railway to give local walkers/ cyclists/Horse riders access to Cannock Chase without using dangerous roads.

Object

Representation ID: 3078

Received: 09/11/2021

Respondent: Ms & Mr G & D Mitchell & Joynson

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.

Highways issue: increased traffic and congestion.
Impact on local schools and other amenities - already strained.
Loss of green recreational spaces - effect on residents mental health.
Increased pollution.
Impact on local wildlife and habitats.
Ample brownfields sites available.
Removal of the last green space in the area.

Object

Representation ID: 3086

Received: 07/11/2021

Respondent: Chris Meeson

Objects to proposed development a Linthouse Lane SA3.

Loss of productive arable land.
Impact on the environment.
Impact amenities such as of power supply, transport, water supply, sewage, water drainage, school/s, healthcare, leisure etc.
Object to building on the green belt.
There is no demand for this development.
Brownfield sites should be utilised.

Object

Representation ID: 3119

Received: 03/12/2021

Respondent: Mr A De Ponte

Site 486c Linthouse Lane

There is very little green land in the surrounding area. We also understand that Wolverhampton Council had promised not to develop greenfield land.

Object

Representation ID: 3121

Received: 11/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Roy Carrier

Negative Impact on wildlife- loss of animal movement in/out of area
Negative impact on traffic safety around school

Object

Representation ID: 3138

Received: 25/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs K Dixon

Green belt needs to be protected
Will Increase carbon emissions and greenhouse gases- adding to climate crisis.
Lanes are narrow so more traffic will lead to lots of congestion

Object

Representation ID: 3140

Received: 04/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Andrew Docker

Infrastructure in the area will not be able to cope with the burden of this development
Roads already chaotic on Linthouse Lane
Schools and doctors are already full
Local shopping centres very busy and difficult to park

Object

Representation ID: 3153

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Karen Drury

a34 and weeping cross islands already busy, new housing would make it worse
Increase road safety concerns
Schools and health centre are already oversubscribed, proposal would put more pressure on
Site has scenic value and proposal would ruin landscape.
Significant negative environmental impact
Proposals unwanted by residents

Object

Representation ID: 3156

Received: 08/12/2021

Respondent: Miss Pollyanna Drury

Service oversubscribed
Will generate extra congestion on A34 and weeping cross roundabouts
Exacerbate congestion and road safety issues
Would negatively impact wildlife and remove an area of natural beauty for residents

Object

Representation ID: 3158

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs Sheila Drury

Roads are chaos, often flooded- proposals would make this worse
A34 busy and other roads etc
Proposal would remove character from "beautiful" fields
Wildlife (deer) also
Schools and doctors are oversubscribed

Object

Representation ID: 3163

Received: 10/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs C Nutting

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.

The proposal will be bordering Wolverhampton, causing Wednesfield and Essington to be blended.
Impact of schools - already at capacity.
There have already been two large developments in the area.
Highways Issues: There are no major roads to the proposed site, increase traffic and pollution.
Extra strain on New Cross hospital.
Impact on already oversubscribed doctors surgeries.
The Birmingham and Black Country wildlife trust states on their maps that Kitchen lane is a wildlife site.
Impact on wildlife and habitats.
Loss of green recreational space.
Disruption to driving and living in the area whilst construction of the site will be unbearable.
Negatively effect local house prices.
Loss of countryside views.

Object

Representation ID: 3170

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Samantha Duckhouse

Development on Greenbelt land
Green space important to physical and mental health of residents- developments would take this away
Developments would increase greenhouse gas emissions

Object

Representation ID: 3172

Received: 15/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Barry Dunn

Some house to be built on a level 3 flood plain
Need to build a new school, a new doctors surgery and dentists as well as they are currently overwhelmed
New road infrastructure needed as there are issues presently with it

Object

Representation ID: 3187

Received: 12/11/2021

Respondent: Riva Eardley

Linthouse Lane
Precious area of greenbelt that has a significant impact for the well-being of local residents.
Encourages walking, cycling etc
Increased Co2 emissions
Would stress the local road network and infrastructure
Would worsen the flooding issues faced currently

Object

Representation ID: 3191

Received: 17/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs Deana Edwards

Linthouse Lane
Would put more pressure on already "crumbling" services and roads in the area.
Would destroy the only real greenspace that residents have
Detrimental impact on wildlife

Object

Representation ID: 3203

Received: 25/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs K Edwards

Linthouse Lane
Increase in urban sprawl
Ecosystem will suffer and the many animals in the area would lose habitat
drains cannot cope as is, so with extra housing flooding could become a real issue
Roads and infrastructure cannot cope with extra people and cars

Object

Representation ID: 3207

Received: 25/11/2021

Respondent: Mr M A Edwards

Linthouse Lane
If existing drains and sewage are used as suggested, they will not be able to cope. Currently bubble up and development would make the problem even worse
Issues with water pressure in local homes would become worse than they are currently
Roads are dangerous
Loss of habitats for local wildlife
Greenspace needed for mental health etc

Object

Representation ID: 3255

Received: 17/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs Deana Edwards

Objects to Linthouse Lane.
- Impact on infrastructure- Local facilities and roads will not cope.
- Loss of Green Belt
- Impact on wildlife
- Brownfield sites should be used before Green Belt.

Object

Representation ID: 3289

Received: 05/12/2021

Respondent: Ms Hannah Furber

Linthouse Lane

Development will cause vehicle emissions.
GP, dentist, hospitals and schools are overstretched.
Development will cause more traffic.
Loss of habitats and wildlife.
Increased CO2 and air pollution.

Object

Representation ID: 3319

Received: 14/12/2021

Respondent: Hilary Footitt

Bilbrook Developments
Significant increase in the volume of traffic down Lane green road-cannot cope with it
Increased noise level for residents- both through traffic and building noise

Object

Representation ID: 3345

Received: 25/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs Dawn Gough

Linthouse Lane
Extra traffic and congestion created
shortage of doctors
More school places needed
Destroying habitat for animals
increased flood risk
Green space to walk etc needed for mental health

Object

Representation ID: 3350

Received: 17/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Andrew Fisher

Objects to Linthouse Lane.
- Impact on Wildlife
-Loss of Agricultural Farmland
- Impact on local infrastructure- increased traffic- local roads will not cope.
- Drainage issues
- Impact on local schools and healthcare services- lack of additional capacity
- Brownfield sites should be used before Green Belt