Question 7

Object

Representation ID: 3353

Received: 02/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Laurence Fletcher

Objects to Linthouse Lane.
- Loss of Green Belt
- Flooding issues- flooding from fields and local canal

Object

Representation ID: 3364

Received: 07/12/2021

Respondent: Susan Nicklin

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.
The proposed land floods.
Highways issues: increased traffic, increased safety concerns around Essington regarding increase traffic, increased congestion.
Increase traffic and highways issues on: Blackhalve Lane, Kitchen Lane, Linthouse Lane.

Who is funding the increase in infrastructure needed, SSDC or WCC?
Reduction in air quality.
Loss of arable land.
Proposed site proposed Stafford Road Yieldfields Development would be better option - better connection to transport links.
Impact on schools - no capacity for such an increase in children.
Two weight limited roads in Essington causing difficult access for construction traffic.
how will SSDC prevent construction traffic through Essington?

Object

Representation ID: 3367

Received: 06/12/2021

Respondent: A Nicklin

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.
The proposed land floods.
Highways issues: increased traffic, increased safety concerns around Essington regarding increase traffic, increased congestion.
Increase traffic and highways issues on: Blackhalve Lane, Kitchen Lane, Linthouse Lane.

Who is funding the increase in infrastructure needed, SSDC or WCC?
Reduction in air quality.
Loss of arable land.
Proposed site proposed Stafford Road Yieldfields Development would be better option - better connection to transport links.
Impact on schools - no capacity for such an increase in children.
Two weight limited roads in Essington causing difficult access for construction traffic.
how will SSDC prevent construction traffic through Essington?

Object

Representation ID: 3372

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs Bethany Nicholls

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.

Impact/Damage of local environment and biodiversity.
Objects to building on the green belt.
Brownfield sites should be utilised first.
Impacts Ashmore Park residents - loss of green open spaces.
Increase in pollution.

Object

Representation ID: 3373

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Reg and Jan Nicholas

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.

Loss of arable land.
Loss of biodiversity.
Increase strain/demand on already overstretched local amenities.
Increase risk of flooding of nearby properties.
Increased pollution.
Highways issues: increase congestion and traffic.

Object

Representation ID: 3390

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs G Grimstead

LINTHOUSE LANE

Development will cause considerable flooding.
Area already has heavy traffic which will be made worse, causing more pollution and harming peoples health.
Removal of hedgerows will destroy habitat and damage wildlife.

Object

Representation ID: 3392

Received: 05/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Robert Grosvenor

Linthouse Lane

Detrimental to Wednesfield Village.
Schools and doctors already over subscribed.
Wolverhampton Council will have no financial gain from this.
Green spaces are vital for physical and mental health and wellbeing, especially since covid. Green space and places to walk are already limited in the area.

Support

Representation ID: 3398

Received: 14/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs Natalie Lovell

Supports Radford Lane sites 350c and 350d not being identified as preferred options.

Adds rationale:
Already local pinch-point at Castlecroft Lane/ Windmill Hill and Greyhound crossroads.
Increased traffic due to inbuilt car dependency of the proposed development due to lack of infrastructure.

Goes against the fundamental Green Belt policy (NPPF) to protect against urban sprawl, large scale residential development disregards function of green belt.

Object

Representation ID: 3413

Received: 17/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Liam Guy

Linthouse Lane

Catastrophic environmental effects from loss of hedgerows, fields and trees.
Bad for climate change.
Local health services already over stretched.
New Cross already under strain.
NHS worker seen pressure it is under first hand.

Object

Representation ID: 3419

Received: 11/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Chris Hammond

Linthouse Lane

Should be kept green.
Should be thinking of residents.
Done through greed.
Should think about wildlife.
Green space important for wellbeing.

Object

Representation ID: 3420

Received: 19/11/2021

Respondent: Thomas Nisbet

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane, SA3.

Increase traffic.
Loss of green spaces.

Object

Representation ID: 3421

Received: 16/11/2021

Respondent: Peter Logan

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane, SA3.

Objects to building on the green belt.
reduction in air quality.
Highways issues: increase in traffic, lanes around not suitable for increase in traffic.
Infrastructural burden will not be felt in South Staffs but Wednesfield North (inc; doctors, dentists and primary schools).
Increased pressure on the Wolverhampton emergency services.

Object

Representation ID: 3425

Received: 17/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Keith Hammond

Linthouse Lane

Area stops urban sprawl.
Should be building on brownfield land. - cooperation between councils.
Loss of agricultural land.
City centre full of areas in need of regeneration into affordable homes.
Green spaces essential for health and wellbeing.

Object

Representation ID: 3426

Received: 16/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Christopher Hampton

Linthouse Lane.

Concerned about traffic increase, already very congested with accidents. Could add 5000 cars to the road.
Strain on local facilities e.g. schools, doctors and shops.
Damage to habitats and wildlife.
Area used to walking and recreation for families, beautiful area.
Fight to save only green space left in area.
Increase in carbon emissions - goes against UK becoming cleaner and greener.

Object

Representation ID: 3433

Received: 17/11/2021

Respondent: Wesley Lloyd

Objects to the proposed development at Linthouse Lane, SA3.
Objects to building on the green belt.
Brownfield land should be utilised first.

Object

Representation ID: 3442

Received: 10/12/2021

Respondent: Jayne Ley

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane, SA3.

Objects to building on the green belt.
Loss of green, recreational land - loss of it's benefits to health and well-being, positive impacts on post and perinatal mental health.
Impact on wildlife, loss of habitat and biodiversity.
Loss of bridal pathways.
Highways issues: mainly single track roads around proposed site they are not suitable for increased traffic; increase in air pollution; increase in speeding; increased traffic and congestion.
Access to Cannock Road A road is single carriage way.
Lack of police presence - increase in crime.
Impact on schools - already at capacity.
Impact on doctors surgery - will be overwhelmed by number of new residents.
Impact on the Royal Wolverhampton Hospital NHS Trust - already at capacity.
Site is known to flood - will new residents be able to get insurance? will their houses flood?
Will South Staffs be offering financial support to Wolverhampton due to impact from site on loacl infrastructure and amenities.
Suggests - and over land to Wolverhampton and turn site into an urban forest, regrown hedgerows, create a wildlife reserve, keep land arable.

Object

Representation ID: 3445

Received: 11/12/2021

Respondent: Tony Levy

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane, SA3.

Highways issues: road surrounding the site are narrow country lanes and con not cope with increase in traffic; increased congestion; road repair and maintenance will come under Wolverhampton.
Impact on utility infrastructure - already have power cuts and loss of water pressure.
Urban sprawl.
Amenities such as doctors, shops, schools ect cannot not support new homes.
Will other services provided such as parks, a library, a pub, community hub ect?

Object

Representation ID: 3467

Received: 12/12/2021

Respondent: Mr D Lavender

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.

Impact on Doctors , Hospitals, shops and schools.
Highways issues: Increase in traffic.
Flooding: site is already known to flood and has a natural drainage ditch.

Object

Representation ID: 3468

Received: 30/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Anthony Lavender

Objects to proposed development at Linthouse Lane SA3.

Objects to building on the green belt.
Greater health risk from increased pollution.
Highway issues: increased traffic and congestions.
Risk of flooding.
Impact on already oversubscribed doctors.
Impact on schools - already at capacity.
Brownfield sites should be utilised.
Increased pressure on Wolverhampton Council amenities.

Object

Representation ID: 3475

Received: 22/11/2021

Respondent: Miss Kelly Hampton

Linthouse Lane

Damage to habitats and wildlife.
Doctors already very busy.
Countryside beautiful and enjoyed by residents.
Will have more vehicles on the roads.

Object

Representation ID: 3480

Received: 05/12/2021

Respondent: Ms Victoria Harrigan

Linthouse Lane.

Traffic already bad and will become worse. It is dangerous.
Schools and doctors are over subscribed.
Will use Wolverhampton Councils infrastructure but council tax go to South Staffs.
Monach's Way runs through site and is well used by locals, important for health and wellbeing.
Will bring additional pollution to area.
Loss of habitats and wildlife.
Poor access to emergency services in area.
Problems with sewerage already at Woodened Road.
Loss of village status.

Object

Representation ID: 3481

Received: 01/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Lee Harris

Linthouse Lane
The negative effects fall outside of the borough of South Staffs. It appears that the plan is to minimize the impact on South Staffordshire and to inconvenience the residents of Wednesfield/ Wolverhampton.

Object

Representation ID: 3492

Received: 23/11/2021

Respondent: B A Hancock

Linthouse Lane
There are very few open spaces left in the area and using this for development would be detrimental.
Increased traffic congestion and therefore pollution in the area
Schools and doctors surgeries are also at breaking point already

Object

Representation ID: 3497

Received: 13/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Kelvin Harris

Linthouse Lane
Low level water will lose its runoff and there will be an increased flood risk
Negative effect on wildlife
Farm land needs to be preserved
climate change

Object

Representation ID: 3505

Received: 16/11/2021

Respondent: Ms Katie Smith

Negative impact on local mental wellbeing
Loss of habitat for wildlife

Object

Representation ID: 3507

Received: 16/11/2021

Respondent: Mr Michael Hart

Linthouse Lane
residents lose a space to walk etc and will negatively effect local mental wellbeing
Would erode natural habitats for wildlife

Object

Representation ID: 3512

Received: 19/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs Carolyne Cockayne

Increase in the volume of traffic
Removal of habitat for wildlife
Residents use it for general exercise etc

Object

Representation ID: 3517

Received: 07/12/2021

Respondent: P Haynes

Flora and fauna will be lost and the eco system will be damaged
Loss of habitat for extensive local wildlife
Increased flood risk
Roads will become more dangerous
Increased pollution
Green spaces are important to residents

Object

Representation ID: 3542

Received: 18/11/2021

Respondent: Ms Louise Hill

Linthouse Lane.

Land is well used by walkers, dog walkers and horse riders.
Run a local walking group that uses it.
Area rich in biodiversity.
Area prone to flooding.
They act as lungs as the area.

Support

Representation ID: 3556

Received: 12/07/2022

Respondent: Suan Lawson

-